Re: Moodle package update request

2010-08-24 Thread Tomasz Muras
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > On 08/23/2010 11:11 PM, Tomasz Muras wrote: >> I have uploaded package version moodle_1.9.9.dfsg-2 to unstable. > > I don't see the upload yet. Please tell us once the package has > been accepted and aged a bit. My mistake - sorry. It has bee

Re: Moodle package update request

2010-08-24 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 08/23/2010 11:11 PM, Tomasz Muras wrote: > I have uploaded package version moodle_1.9.9.dfsg-2 to unstable. I don't see the upload yet. Please tell us once the package has been accepted and aged a bit. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi

Re: Moodle package update request

2010-08-23 Thread Tomasz Muras
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Tomasz Muras wrote: > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: >> On 08/16/2010 10:55 PM, Tomasz Muras wrote: >> If the license is ok, then there is no need to repackage the source. >> But, it you're going to repackage the source, I'll wait for the ne

Re: Moodle package update request

2010-08-17 Thread Tomasz Muras
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > On 08/16/2010 10:55 PM, Tomasz Muras wrote: >> >> So this is case 2) for me. But now the problem I'm facing is that I've >> added "dfsg" already, so I can't go back to the numbering without it! >> I understand that what I did: removing .swf i

Re: Moodle package update request

2010-08-16 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 08/16/2010 10:55 PM, Tomasz Muras wrote: > > So this is case 2) for me. But now the problem I'm facing is that I've > added "dfsg" already, so I can't go back to the numbering without it! > I understand that what I did: removing .swf in rules and adding "dfsg" > didn't make too much of a sense.

Re: Moodle package update request

2010-08-16 Thread Tomasz Muras
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 3:34 AM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > On 08/16/2010 12:22 AM, Tomasz Muras wrote: >> >> Two of the .swf files don't have the source code, so I understand >> that they would have to go to non-free (if packaged at all). Other >> would have to go to contrib, as they can't be build wi

Re: Moodle package update request

2010-08-15 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 08/15/2010 10:50 PM, Tomasz Muras wrote: > Hello (chilly) release team, > > I need my package: moodle updated in Squeeze. I have done only > critical changes to the package and uploaded it to unstable as > moodle_1.9.9.dfsg-1. > > The changes are: > * translation updates > * removing non-fre

Moodle package update request

2010-08-15 Thread Tomasz Muras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello (chilly) release team, I need my package: moodle updated in Squeeze. I have done only critical changes to the package and uploaded it to unstable as moodle_1.9.9.dfsg-1. The changes are: * translation updates * removing non-free .swf files (#59