On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 11:06:05 +, Toby Smithe wrote:
> On 6 March 2013 05:46, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > In general, sure, improved architecture support is great. During a
> > freeze however it's often more of a "feature" and generally won't be as
> > well tested as previously supported arc
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 23:38 +, Toby Smithe wrote:
> On 5 March 2013 21:18, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 22:02 +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> >> A debdiff would help a lot to review the changes.
> >
> > Indeed. As a side note, new architecture support generally isn't
> > appropri
Dear all,
On 5 March 2013 21:18, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 22:02 +0100, intrigeri wrote:
>> A debdiff would help a lot to review the changes.
>
> Indeed. As a side note, new architecture support generally isn't
> appropriate material for an unblock (hurd support possibly even
On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 22:02 +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> Toby Smithe wrote (03 Mar 2013 16:42:59 GMT) :
> > It would be really good to have this version 1.3 in wheezy, because
> > of the "major nuisance" being fixed, but also because of the fact
> > that I've fixed this new package to be buildable and
Hi,
Toby Smithe wrote (03 Mar 2013 16:42:59 GMT) :
> It would be really good to have this version 1.3 in wheezy, because
> of the "major nuisance" being fixed, but also because of the fact
> that I've fixed this new package to be buildable and installable on
> kFreeBSD and Hurd.
A debdiff would h
Dear debian-release,
(I am CC'ing my sponsor, Tobias, and I am not subscribed to the list,
so please CC me in responses.)
I maintain the `musescore' package, and upstream have just made a new
release to fix some bugs; at their release notes[0], they write,
"Two bugs causing a major nuisance and
6 matches
Mail list logo
