On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 10:39:50PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
If there are no changes in ABI between libarchive1 and libarchive2,
the best here is to revert the package rename, if necessary keeping a
libarchive.so.1 - libarchive.so.2 compat symlink in the package for
compatibility both
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 09:27:48AM +0200, Steve Langasek wrote:
patch that reverts the SONAME change in the autotools by breaking the
link between the upstream version string and the library version info
and setting version info directly.
I would instead leave the upstream code alone, and
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 08:41:49 -0500
John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 09:27:48AM +0200, Steve Langasek wrote:
patch that reverts the SONAME change in the autotools by breaking
the link between the upstream version string and the library
version info and
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 03:08:40PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
John: are you able to upload libarchive with this patch to revert to
libarchive1 or can I have your permission to upload the NMU to the
delayed queue (or even direct to unstable) this week instead of next?
I plan to upload it
Hi Neil,
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 08:36:45PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
Regarding #418637.
I've prepared a new release of deb-gview which Build-Depends on
libarchive-dev. libarchive1 has been replaced by libarchive2 in
unstable but I cannot find any ABI/API change as yet - I use deb-gview
On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 14:48:30 +0200
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Neil,
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 08:36:45PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
Regarding #418637.
I've prepared a new release of deb-gview which Build-Depends on
libarchive-dev. libarchive1 has been replaced by
Regarding #418637.
I've prepared a new release of deb-gview which Build-Depends on
libarchive-dev. libarchive1 has been replaced by libarchive2 in
unstable but I cannot find any ABI/API change as yet - I use deb-gview
and reprepro regularly (I suspect others would use the two together as
well)
7 matches
Mail list logo
