Re: Please consider a binNMU on reprepro due to libarchive transition.

2007-04-16 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 10:39:50PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: If there are no changes in ABI between libarchive1 and libarchive2, the best here is to revert the package rename, if necessary keeping a libarchive.so.1 - libarchive.so.2 compat symlink in the package for compatibility both

Re: Bug#418637: Please consider a binNMU on reprepro due to libarchive transition.

2007-04-16 Thread John Goerzen
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 09:27:48AM +0200, Steve Langasek wrote: patch that reverts the SONAME change in the autotools by breaking the link between the upstream version string and the library version info and setting version info directly. I would instead leave the upstream code alone, and

Re: Bug#418637: Please consider a binNMU on reprepro due to libarchive transition.

2007-04-16 Thread Neil Williams
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 08:41:49 -0500 John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 09:27:48AM +0200, Steve Langasek wrote: patch that reverts the SONAME change in the autotools by breaking the link between the upstream version string and the library version info and

Re: Bug#418637: Please consider a binNMU on reprepro due to libarchive transition.

2007-04-16 Thread John Goerzen
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 03:08:40PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: John: are you able to upload libarchive with this patch to revert to libarchive1 or can I have your permission to upload the NMU to the delayed queue (or even direct to unstable) this week instead of next? I plan to upload it

Re: Please consider a binNMU on reprepro due to libarchive transition.

2007-04-15 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Neil, On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 08:36:45PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: Regarding #418637. I've prepared a new release of deb-gview which Build-Depends on libarchive-dev. libarchive1 has been replaced by libarchive2 in unstable but I cannot find any ABI/API change as yet - I use deb-gview

Re: Please consider a binNMU on reprepro due to libarchive transition.

2007-04-15 Thread Neil Williams
On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 14:48:30 +0200 Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Neil, On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 08:36:45PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: Regarding #418637. I've prepared a new release of deb-gview which Build-Depends on libarchive-dev. libarchive1 has been replaced by

Please consider a binNMU on reprepro due to libarchive transition.

2007-04-14 Thread Neil Williams
Regarding #418637. I've prepared a new release of deb-gview which Build-Depends on libarchive-dev. libarchive1 has been replaced by libarchive2 in unstable but I cannot find any ABI/API change as yet - I use deb-gview and reprepro regularly (I suspect others would use the two together as well)