* Matthias Klose ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041213 00:00]:
> [...]
Matthias, please ignore my previous mail. If you look at the time stamp,
it is more or less historical-only. Sorry for that.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F
Andreas Barth writes:
> > systemimager doesn't build-depend on gcc-3.2 anymore (in unstable). I
> > we really need to keep gcc-3.2, I'd like to remove the binaries not
> > really needed (g++-3.2, g77-3.2, gnat-3.2, gobjc-3.2,
> > libstdc++5-{dbg,dev,pic} (not libstdc++5-3.3-{dbg,dev,pic}), gcc-3.2-
* Matthias Klose ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040731 11:25]:
> Andreas Barth writes:
> > currently, three package still build-dep on gcc-3.2: libxml2,
> > systemimager and xen. However, 520 packages depend on one of the
> > libxml2-binary packages, including kde and gnome. So, I would consider
> > it a bad
On 2004-07-31 Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andreas Barth writes:
>> currently, three package still build-dep on gcc-3.2: libxml2,
>> systemimager and xen. However, 520 packages depend on one of the
>> libxml2-binary packages, including kde and gnome. So, I would consider
>> it a bad
Andreas Barth writes:
> Hi,
>
> currently, three package still build-dep on gcc-3.2: libxml2,
> systemimager and xen. However, 520 packages depend on one of the
> libxml2-binary packages, including kde and gnome. So, I would consider
> it a bad idea to remove gcc-3.2 before release of sarge.
syst
Hi,
currently, three package still build-dep on gcc-3.2: libxml2,
systemimager and xen. However, 520 packages depend on one of the
libxml2-binary packages, including kde and gnome. So, I would consider
it a bad idea to remove gcc-3.2 before release of sarge.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor
6 matches
Mail list logo