Steve Langasek wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
In the meantime, I'm downgrading 160579 because I don't see anything in=
that
report that would justify claiming the package is unreleasable.
It's also vulnerable to CVE-2004-2656 (no bug seems to exist) and
CVE-2001-1535 (328927).
FWIW, of
On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 09:48:42PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
In the meantime, I'm downgrading 160579 because I don't see anything in=
that
report that would justify claiming the package is unreleasable.
It's also vulnerable to
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 11:09:50PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
In the meantime, I'm downgrading 160579 because I don't see anything in that
report that would justify claiming the package is unreleasable.
It's also vulnerable to CVE-2004-2656 (no bug seems to
severity 160579 minor
thanks
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 04:21:20PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
I'd like to request removal of knowledgetree for testing for these
reasons:
* Has two security issues;
* Has an open request for adoption since a couple of months but no takers;
* Has low popcon
Hi,
I'd like to request removal of knowledgetree for testing for these
reasons:
* Has two security issues;
* Has an open request for adoption since a couple of months but no takers;
* Has low popcon numbers;
* Is a couple of versions behind upstream.
(See bug #373137)
Same goes for slash:
* Has
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 04:21:20PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
I'd like to request removal of knowledgetree for testing for these
reasons:
Same goes for slash:
I think you should ask for removal from the archive for such packages.
Bastian
--
No one wants war.
-- Kirk,
6 matches
Mail list logo
