On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 11:02:16PM +0100, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 08:51:06PM +0100, Bj?rn Stenberg wrote:
> > Either you are wrong, the debian testing scripts are buggy or my script is,
> > because it lists several other reasons why meta-gnome2 can't go into
> > testing yet
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 08:51:06PM +0100, Björn Stenberg wrote:
> Either you are wrong, the debian testing scripts are buggy or my script is,
> because it lists several other reasons why meta-gnome2 can't go into testing
> yet:
Yeah. It's not too clear for me why galeon or epiphany-browser is ne
Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 10:31:58PM +0100, Björn Stenberg wrote:
> > Colin Watson wrote:
> > > > - meta-gnome2 has unsatisfiable dependencies:
> > > > - gnome needs rhythmbox compiled for mips
> > > > - gnome-desktop-environment needs epiphany-browser compiled for mips
>
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 10:31:58PM +0100, Björn Stenberg wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > > - meta-gnome2 has unsatisfiable dependencies:
> > > - gnome needs rhythmbox compiled for mips
> > > - gnome-desktop-environment needs epiphany-browser compiled for mips
> > > - gnome-office needs pl
Colin Watson wrote:
> > - meta-gnome2 has unsatisfiable dependencies:
> > - gnome needs rhythmbox compiled for mips
> > - gnome-desktop-environment needs epiphany-browser compiled for mips
> > - gnome-office needs planner compiled for m68k, mips, sparc
>
> Those don't make it not a valid
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 08:51:06PM +0100, Björn Stenberg wrote:
> Jordi Mallach wrote:
> > [0] today's update excuses claim that meta-gnome2 needs galeon to go in,
> > while it really doesn't, as it's just an alternative to
> > epiphany-browser. We'll see if this blocks meta-gnome2 tonight, and if
Jordi Mallach wrote:
> [0] today's update excuses claim that meta-gnome2 needs galeon to go in,
> while it really doesn't, as it's just an alternative to
> epiphany-browser. We'll see if this blocks meta-gnome2 tonight, and if
> it does, I'll tell aj to apply some voodoo magic.
Either you are wron
Hi guys,
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 07:36:33PM +0100, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> We have been trying to get the meta-gnome2 deps in testing for a long
> while, but for different reasons (libtool, python and gcc breakages, new
> deps being added...) it hasn't happened yet.
Consider the freeze over, all t
On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> you're a porter and want to help us, please, schedule the needed builds
> if you think the problems are fixed now. Thanks :)
Is there actually a way to ask pbuilder to retry to build a package for
a specific arch?
kr,
Chipzz AKA
Jan Van Buggenhout
--
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 07:36:33PM +0100, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have been trying to get the meta-gnome2 deps in testing for a long
> while, but for different reasons (libtool, python and gcc breakages, new
> deps being added...) it hasn't happened yet.
>
> Right now, we need the follo
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 07:36:33PM +0100, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> We have been trying to get the meta-gnome2 deps in testing for a long
> while, but for different reasons (libtool, python and gcc breakages, new
> deps being added...) it hasn't happened yet.
>
> Right now, we need the following to h
Hi,
We have been trying to get the meta-gnome2 deps in testing for a long
while, but for different reasons (libtool, python and gcc breakages, new
deps being added...) it hasn't happened yet.
Right now, we need the following to happen:
- libbonoboui: missing arm, mips, s390 (python breakage)
- li
12 matches
Mail list logo
