Steve Langasek wrote:
> Sorry, but how does enabling utf8 support in slrn make the lack of a
> default charset for broken articles any worse than it already is?
The utf8 patch disabled the possibility to set a default charset.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
> >> for a stable release (e.g. #411667).
> >> Please unblock slrn 0.9.8.1pl1-28 which has this patch disabled.
> > Your upload seems to disable three different patches, not just one;
> > why was it not sufficient to disable the last, "fallback_charset" p
Steve Langasek wrote:
> Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
>> I decided to disable the charset patch introduced in -22 again,
>> because it leads to some problems which I think aren't acceptable
>> for a stable release (e.g. #411667).
>>
>> Please unblock slrn 0.9.8
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 09:13:06PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> I decided to disable the charset patch introduced in -22 again, because
> it leads to some problems which I think aren't acceptable for a stable
> release (e.g. #411667).
> Please unblock slrn 0.9.8.1pl1-
Hi,
I decided to disable the charset patch introduced in -22 again, because
it leads to some problems which I think aren't acceptable for a stable
release (e.g. #411667).
Please unblock slrn 0.9.8.1pl1-28 which has this patch disabled.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
5 matches
Mail list logo
