On Thu, December 27, 2007 12:03, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 updated
[...]
The complete list of all accepted and rejected packages together with
rationale is on the preparation page for this revision:
http://release.debian.org/stable/4.0/4.0r2/
A couple of minor comments
Quoting Kuruvilla, Chindu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hello,
I'm Chindu Kuruvilla working as Computer Support Specialist
working with College of the North Atlantic - Qatar in the Middle East.
I was setting up a syslog server for managing our Cisco devices I am a
novice user @
Hi, I will follow up this discussion under the debian-project mailing list
2007/6/8, Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 08:25:14PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Personally, I would like to see us able to provide security support for
sarge through the release of lenny, so
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 08:25:14PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
I could take a DNS server in example, when the server is configured and
work, I have no reason to update the server to a new release for at least
4
years if it have the latest security patches. Upgrading to a new stable
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 06:52:34PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
Personally, I would like to see us able to provide security support for
sarge through the release of lenny, so that users can opt to skip a
release if they need a longer cycle, passing through etch only long enough
to adjust
On 2007-06-07 10:07, Frédéric PICA wrote:
I want to use debian in a production environnement and I think
this life time is to short.
I agree with you but see little chance that Debian will fix this.
Our 18 months target right now is a compromise, and those never suit
everyone.
To support a
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 12:07:58PM +0200, Frédéric PICA wrote:
I could take a DNS server in example, when the server is configured and
work, I have no reason to update the server to a new release for at least 4
years if it have the latest security patches. Upgrading to a new stable
version
Le jeudi 7 juin 2007 06:07, Frédéric PICA a écrit :
Greets,
I am looking on the debian release cycle and I saw that the lenny release
is planned for 2008-2009.
[...]
Quoting http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/ :
Coordinating Debian releases
Coordination of Debian releases issues such
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 12:02:58AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 12:07:58PM +0200, Frédéric PICA wrote:
I could take a DNS server in example, when the server is configured and
work, I have no reason to update the server to a new release for at least 4
years if it have
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 08:25:14PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Personally, I would like to see us able to provide security support for
sarge through the release of lenny, so that users can opt to skip a release
if they need a longer cycle, passing through etch only long enough to adjust
their
On 5/22/07, Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Tapio Laihinen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070513 21:34]:
When the Non-US version of the etch is coming?
The non-us-branch of Debian has already been discontinued with the
release of sarge.
In this case it should be removed from the manuals and
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 06:38:22PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
http://www.debian.org/mirror/list-non-US
The latter page should remain as an archive. Where did you see it linked
from?
I found a link on /distrib/ftplist. That will now be moved to
/distrib/archive.
--
2. That which causes
On 5/23/07, Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 07:28:06PM +0300, Teodor wrote:
In this case it should be removed from the manuals and the web pages:
http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
I'm removing it from that page now, thanks for the note. It's older than
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 07:49:20PM +0300, Teodor wrote:
IMO all pages that contains references to the non-US archive should be
modified to state that it was integrated in the `main' archive and
removed on ${DATE} or with release 3.1.
/mirror/list-non-US actually does say so.
--
2. That
* Tapio Laihinen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070513 21:34]:
When the Non-US version of the etch is coming?
The non-us-branch of Debian has already been discontinued with the
release of sarge.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Sun, 13 May 2007 22:17:56 +0300, Tapio Laihinen wrote:
Hello.
When the Non-US version of the etch is coming?
Tapio Laihinen
Check out http://www.debian.org/mirror/list-non-US:
To prevent anyone from taking unnecessary legal risks, some Debian
packages were only available from a site in
I am only going to make this question as interested user.
Since live-cd is happening, they are doing a great job, i think it would
be interesting to have d-i used to install the system from the live-cd.
I know it is possible, but how it is possible, i don't relly know.
Qua, 2007-04-18 às 22:18
Luis Matos wrote:
Since live-cd is happening, they are doing a great job, i think it would
be interesting to have d-i used to install the system from the live-cd.
I know it is possible, but how it is possible, i don't relly know.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-desktop/2007/04/msg00018.html
On Thursday 19 April 2007 13:26, Luis Matos wrote:
Since live-cd is happening, they are doing a great job, i think it
would be interesting to have d-i used to install the system from the
live-cd.
I know it is possible, but how it is possible, i don't relly know.
As Ubuntu is already doing
On Tuesday 17 April 2007 21:06, Luk Claes wrote:
We would like to know which major features are expected to be added in
the next 24 months and how much time you expect them to need to get
stable enough for a Debian stable release.
An overview of the plans of the D-I team can be found at:
On 4/18/07, Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 17 April 2007 21:06, Luk Claes wrote:
We would like to know which major features are expected to be added in
the next 24 months and how much time you expect them to need to get
stable enough for a Debian stable release.
An overview of
* kernel-patch-openvz (version in unstable now)
[SECURITY]: Deadlock in mincore (CVE-2006-4814)
and a number of other critical fixes
This CVE refers to a kernel bug in Linux 2.4, how does that apply here?
It is 100% 2.6 related, check the following changelog:
Steve Langasek wrote:
* kernel-patch-openvz (version in unstable now)
[SECURITY]: Deadlock in mincore (CVE-2006-4814)
and a number of other critical fixes
This CVE refers to a kernel bug in Linux 2.4, how does that apply here?
Here is the patch in question. Perhaps Linus gave the
Marc,
* kernel-patch-openvz
And finally I would like you to consider to accept the version
of kernel-patch-openvz that I have uploaded to experimental.
I know that this is a quite big change but there are a number
of reasons why it should be done.
I don't think this qualifies for a freeze
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 11:09:53AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/3.1_r5/powerpc/iso-cd/debian-31r5-powerpc-binary-1.iso
doesnt boot on a clamshell ibook nor on a ibook g3 (800mhz). I know that
sarge r0 or r1 worked.
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 11:09:53AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/3.1_r5/powerpc/iso-cd/debian-31r5-powerpc-binary-1.iso
doesnt boot on a clamshell ibook nor on a ibook g3 (800mhz). I know that
sarge r0 or r1 worked.
Hi,
On Thursday 22 February 2007 11:17, Steve Langasek wrote:
No, the release team doesn't create those images. Please contact
debian-cd.
Ok. But debian-release@ is the right list to contact the stable release team,
isn't it? (I understand that for this specific request debian-cd@ is
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 02:26:02PM -, Alan Baghumian wrote:
I'll thank you, if you do the same with aspell-hy. Recently I've submitted
a patch for gedit (#406794) to support aspell-hy, and if you accept to
enter aspell-hy in Etch, it would be nice.
aspell-hy unblocked.
Cheers,
--
Steve
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 01:28:14PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
These changes include a bump to the debhelper compat level with no apparent
rationale, in addition to the extensive upstream changes; I'm not
comfortable unblocking this (and it hardly seems I would have a
Hi,
I'll thank you, if you do the same with aspell-hy. Recently I've submitted
a patch for gedit (#406794) to support aspell-hy, and if you accept to
enter aspell-hy in Etch, it would be nice.
Thanks,
Alan
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 11:43:17AM +0200, Lior Kaplan wrote:
During the last 5 months
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 03:14:25AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
These are d-i build deps that provide files that go on d-i images, that
currently have different versions in unstable and testing. The
significance is that since rc2 will be built on the autobuilders, it
will build against the unstable
Steve Langasek wrote:
These changes include a bump to the debhelper compat level with no apparent
rationale, in addition to the extensive upstream changes; I'm not
comfortable unblocking this (and it hardly seems I would have a chance to
anyway, we're already at version 1.4.15 in unstable
* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-05 03:14]:
apex-nslu2 | 1.4.7 | testing | arm
apex-nslu2 | 1.4.14 | unstable | arm
Several changes.
Yes, there are quite a few changes but I tested the new version
yesterday and it seems to work fine. I don't have a problem with
Hi,
I prefer to have latest aspell-fa and also aspell-hy ;-) in Etch.
Alan
On 02/03/2007 03:34:47 PM, Lior Kaplan wrote:
Frans Pop wrote:
On Saturday 03 February 2007 10:43, Lior Kaplan wrote:
aspell-ar-large - 49 days in unstable, not present in Etch.
ttf-freefarsi - 50 days in unstable,
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 11:43:12PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
Package: debian-archive-keyring
Version: 2006.11.22
Severity: serious
debian-archive-keyring does not depent on an apt that comes with
apt-key, so in the course of upgrading from sarge to etch one can
end up with a system
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my opinion, since apt depends debian-archive-keyring, the proper fix
is to do 'apt-key update' in apt postinst (in supplement to
doing it in debian-archive-keyring postinst).
That sounds like a nice idea.
Adding a dependency on apt to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steffen Joeris wrote:
Hi
I know that this is an old and long discussed bug, but please allow me to
raise the discussion again right now as I think that the issue is not
completely clear.
First of all the bug is called: debian-edu-config:
What do you think?
*I* do think that, if that bug is RC for debian-edu-config, then
another one should be opened for localization-config, which does
exactly the same (actually not in very good shape for etch as it
basically does nothing). BTW, localization-config is maintained as
part of
On 2006-11-03 18:07 +, Mark Purcell wrote:
So one common factor seems to be the arm buildd's failing and not
rescheduling.. I shall try and get some binary packages built on leisner for
arm.
Wookey. If you are able could I ask you to upload the build-deps for:
kaffeine, klibido,
Hi Steffen,
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 09:32:21PM +1100, Steffen Joeris wrote:
I know that this is an old and long discussed bug, but please allow me to
raise the discussion again right now as I think that the issue is not
completely clear.
First of all the bug is called: debian-edu-config:
Le mardi 10 octobre 2006 à 07:18 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe a écrit :
On 10/8/06, Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Just today mike emmel fixed the boom bug, it should technically
possible switching to GTK+ 2.10.x.
Repeating this
On 10/10/06, Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current plan is to ship GNOME 2.14 in etch [1]. This was a hard
decision to make, but we prefer shipping a rock-solid and polished 2.14
version rather than a buggy 2.16 version with which Ubuntu is having
many issues.
[1]
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Just today mike emmel fixed the boom bug, it should technically
possible switching to GTK+ 2.10.x.
Repeating this here for other readers: 2.10.6-2 in experimental was
uploaded today with the fix.
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To
Hubert Chan wrote:
So please upload your packages now, if you haven't done so already.
Please don't NMU lusernet.app; I'm working with Sergey Golovin to port
it to Pantomime 1.2. It's basically ready but I need more time to
test it thoroughly. This will allow us to drop pantomime1 from the
On Friday 08 September 2006 20:14, Jeremy Herndon wrote:
I currently do not subscribe to the mailing lists. So I don't know if
this has been considered.
Hi,
Ok, CC:ed, but probaby -project is a far better place to discuss sich
considerations.
I want to offer a suggestion for a new
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 10:14:45AM -0700, Jeremy Herndon wrote:
I currently do not subscribe to the mailing lists. So I don't know if
this has been considered.
Besides a couple of months ago, when you sent this very same message?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/07/msg00959.html
--
This discussion has been had before and at the moment there aren't any
plans to change the naming scheme.
On 9/9/06, Jeremy Herndon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I currently do not subscribe to the mailing lists. So I don't know if
this has been considered.
I want to offer a suggestion for a new
So you want a binary nmu? if yes, you should send a mail to
debian-release@lists.debian.org asking for it and it should be done by
the buildd network without much hassle.
I have filed #375158 now, severity grave, to get RM's attention.
You shouldn't report a bug just to ask for a
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 07:48:15PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
So you want a binary nmu? if yes, you should send a mail to
debian-release@lists.debian.org asking for it and it should be done by
the buildd network without much hassle.
I have filed #375158 now, severity grave, to get RM's
On Thursday 22 June 2006 22:29, Frans Pop wrote:
Now that 2.6.16-15 kernels have been uploaded to unstable (using a
linux-2.6.16 source package), we can start thinking about the Etch Beta
3 release of D-I.
For d-i development this means that we are now in stabilizing and
bugfixing mode.
So,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Guggenberger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So you want a binary nmu? if yes, you should send a mail to
debian-release@lists.debian.org asking for it and it should be done by
the buildd network without much hassle.
I have filed #375158 now,
?? wrote:
I wanna debian history
if exist summarize debian history infomation
ttp://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/project-history/
http://cvs.infodrom.org/calendar/calendar.infodrom.debian
Regards,
Joey
--
Every use of Linux is a proper use of Linux. -- Jon 'maddog' Hall
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I've just been through the ntp source tree looking at all the
copyright and license assertions. Executive summary is that there are
indeed some problems, but it's not bad, and I believe it can be fixed
with an upload that elides certain bits from the upstream
Bob Proulx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Matthew Garrett wrote:
Bdale Garbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are several files that are BSD with advertising clause, including
libntp/memmove.c, libntp/mktime.c, libntp/random.c, libntp/strerror.c,
libntp/strstr.c, ntpd/refclock_jupiter.c, and
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 00:03 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
The maintainers should have a chance to clear up this question first.
Ok, I've just been through the ntp source tree looking at all the
copyright and license assertions. Executive summary is that there are
indeed some problems, but it's
Bdale Garbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The file util/ansi2knr.c is also GPL. I'm pretty sure it's unused, but
an easy reference in debian/copyright would cover it.
This may be a problem if it is used, as:
There are several files that are BSD with advertising clause, including
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 12:52:48AM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
* Ask the RMs/QA for an exception due to GNUstep's nature
There is already a precedent in FHS - the /usr/lib/X11R6 directory.
GNUstep is not a different case, just a less important one. For now.
(I am CC-ing Anton Zinoviev, who
Hubert Chan a écrit :
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:48:38 +0300, Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it would be very hard to get /usr/GNUstep added to FHS.
/usr/OpenStep ?
For some strange reason, -policy seems to be rather quiet on this issue
this time around. There's only
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 01:11:06PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 03:18:24PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
--
About This CD
=
This CD-ROM is labeled
Debian GNU/Linux testing Sarge - Official Snapshot i386 Binary-14
which means that this CD is number
Hi Steve,
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 03:18:24PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
I've just downloaded CD 14 of the sarge snapshot;
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/weekly/i386/sarge-i386-14.iso
The top-level readme.txt contains the following erroneous text:
--
About This CD
=
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 04:15:09PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
I've started a [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ at
http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianReleaseFAQ
I hope it can help save some valuable release team time and reduce
annoying messages to this list.
Q: Can you change testing's code name or
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 14:59:24 +0200
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I object to the Release Manager's decision of choosing a
military-related term (sarge) for the next release of Debian.
Your April fools joke is a bit late this year...
grts Tim
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 02:59:24PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
Hello,
I object to the Release Manager's decision of choosing a military-related
term (sarge) for the next release of Debian.
Yeah, I agree. I also object to choosing an adjective ('woody') as one
of our release names. We
Hi Robert!
You wrote:
I object to the Release Manager's decision of choosing a military-related
term (sarge) for the next release of Debian.
I don't think this is done intentionaly, but using military terms to codename
a Debian release is in fact turning an innocent element into
This is just as ridiculous as the petition for changing the name of the
The Two Towers movie after 9-11.
Hey, I don't mind if you find my petition ridiculous, but don't put Toy Story
at the same level as Tolkien's work ok? ;)
--
Robert Millan
[..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 02:55:45PM -0500, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
Now
that I think of it though, if Adrian Bunk had his way it may be acceptable
to have a release without an installer
It's not acceptable to have a release without an installer. It is,
in fact, utterly unthinkable.
Hi, I
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 10:22:22AM -0500, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
- The debian-installer (d-i) is in what I would call almost a releasable
state, but that's just my opinion. See debian-boot for information.
Without it being on the CDs, it's
Peter Palfrader wrote:
I intended to ask for removal of this list but Joey sugested to ask
first whether anybody intents to use this list or finds it useful as it
is now.
I took a list at the content of this list. In theory it should be
used for release management but since this burdon
Previously Peter Palfrader wrote:
I intended to ask for removal of this list but Joey sugested to ask
first whether anybody intents to use this list or finds it useful as it
is now.
I think it would be useful, but if the release manager doesn't use it
we might as well remove it I guess.
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
While I may not be too concerned one way or another about the name of the
next release, I do have some ideas about how it might be good to handle
the next release. My overriding goal for this release was to manage to
get a short, controllable freeze; one
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 02:45:37PM +0100, Nils Lohner wrote:
http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-us/dists/Debian2.2r2/non-US/ChangeLog
Arse. I should have picked up on this earlier - the non-US Changelog
is inconsistent. The r2 Changelog file names are relative to the
dists/ directory, while
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Jim Westveer wrote:
On 23-Mar-2000 J.A. Bezemer wrote:
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
snip
We consider anything to be official ONLY if it is mentioned in the
ChangeLog.
Everything else has been (very!) unreliable in the past.
NOTE: Has
On Sun, 26 Mar 2000, Philip Charles wrote:
On Sat, 25 Mar 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Jim Westveer wrote:
On 23-Mar-2000 J.A. Bezemer wrote:
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
snip
We consider anything to be official ONLY if it
On Fri, Mar 24, 2000 at 01:53:12PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
Which only appeared with 2.1r5? Strange indeed. Can you report a bug
if you want me to look at it, please?
I've tried, but I can't reproduce it. I wanted to connect to
news.megasys.it (public news server, probably) and I have a
Previously Jordi wrote:
I thought 2.1r5 had been released already, but I can't find it on the ftps.
The changelog does not mention a release neither so I guess it didn't
happen.
Will it be released?
as far as I know it has been released, but nobody has done an
announcement about it. Is there
On Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 04:47:56PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Jordi wrote:
I thought 2.1r5 had been released already, but I can't find it on the ftps.
The changelog does not mention a release neither so I guess it didn't
happen.
Will it be released?
as far as I know it
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Jordi wrote:
I thought 2.1r5 had been released already, but I can't find it on the ftps.
The changelog does not mention a release neither so I guess it didn't
happen.
Will it be released?
as far as I know it has been released,
Vincent, what about w3-el dependencies?
Ah, leafnode has strange segmentation fault... :(
bye
Christian
On 23-Mar-2000 J.A. Bezemer wrote:
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
snip
We consider anything to be official ONLY if it is mentioned in the
ChangeLog.
Everything else has been (very!) unreliable in the past.
NOTE: Has the new w3-el-e20 already been installed?? (The
On 23-Mar-2000 J.A. Bezemer wrote:
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
snip
We consider anything to be official ONLY if it is mentioned in the ChangeLog.
Everything else has been (very!) unreliable in the past.
NOTE: Has the new w3-el-e20 already been installed?? (The
On Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 04:52:07PM +, Vincent Renardias wrote:
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Jordi wrote:
I thought 2.1r5 had been released already, but I can't find it on the
ftps.
The changelog does not mention a release neither so I guess it didn't
On Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 06:19:36PM +0100, Christian Surchi wrote:
Ah, leafnode has strange segmentation fault... :(
What segfaults? Did it work before? I did actually test this version,
but it's possible that I missed something. There are a number of bugs
in 1.6 that cause random segfaults
Vincent Renardias wrote:
here's the list of packages that I plan to include in 2.1r5:
http://www.debian.org/~vincent/2.1r5.txt
webalyser:http://bugs.debian.org/53820
It's called webalizer :)
And I just made a quick fix to the slink version of webalizer that seems to
solve the problems.
Vincent Renardias wrote:
hello,
here's the list of packages that I plan to include in 2.1r5:
http://www.debian.org/~vincent/2.1r5.txt
(I'll also probably include the m68k boot-floppies, but the corresponding
.changes file seems to be missing...)
wml is missing, probably more, lists
Previously Vincent Renardias wrote:
here's the list of packages that I plan to include in 2.1r5:
http://www.debian.org/~vincent/2.1r5.txt
Euh, could you please mail the whole list as well? I usually do my work
offline so this is somewhat inconvenient for me..
Wichert.
--
Hi,
At Fri, 7 Jan 2000 12:50:15 + (GMT),
Vincent Renardias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
here's the list of packages that I plan to include in 2.1r5:
http://www.debian.org/~vincent/2.1r5.txt
[Vincent 2000/01/07]
package : fml
version : 3.0+beta.2102-0slink1
architectures:
Vincent == Vincent Renardias [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Vincent hello,
Vincent here's the list of packages that I plan to include in
Vincent 2.1r5: http://www.debian.org/~vincent/2.1r5.txt (I'll
Vincent also probably include the m68k boot-floppies, but the
Vincent
On 8 Dec 1999, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
Just to confirm, for the updated 2.1r4 boot-floppies, I am only
diverging from pure slink 2.1r4 in the following pkgs (mostly for base):
-rw-r--r-- 1 apharris users 1943492 Dec 7 23:24
kernel-image-2.0.38_2.0.38-1_i386.deb
-rw-rw-r-- 1
Previously Adam Di Carlo wrote:
What is your targetted freeze date or whatever, so I know when this
stuff is due ?
Let me intervene here and say that I want to see 2.1r4 happen this week,
sunday at the *very* latest. We simply cannot delay y2k updates any
longer.
Wichert.
--
[
debian-test members: I'd like to have success/failure reports concerning
the kernel* and pcmcia* packages listed below; they're supposed to go on
the 2.1r4 boot-floppies, so any feedback is welcome.
]
On 4 Dec 1999, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
I had been asked about boot-floppies and whether we
Vincent Renardias [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Did you find a slink machine usable for this compilation BTW?
Yeah -- I think so.
Thanks for the pointers and stuff, Vincent.
What is your targetted freeze date or whatever, so I know when this
stuff is due ?
--
.Adam Di [EMAIL
On Sat, 28 Aug 1999, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Previously Vincent Renardias wrote:
2.1r3 is the next release of slink;
Right. It's the third point-release of slink, and point-release only
have security-fixes and very important bugfixes.
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Previously Vincent Renardias wrote:
2.1r3 is the next release of slink;
Right. It's the third point-release of slink, and point-release only
have security-fixes and very important bugfixes.
IMHO the stable update should be 2.2 and then potato
Josip Rodin wrote:
Then 2.2 - 2.3 change would be upgrade to a semi-incompatible libc version
and a big bunch of other (relatively) minor packages. Am I right?
Yes... semi-incompatible libc, semi-incompatible gcc,
semi-incompatible kernel, semi-incompatible perl... all in all it might
warrant a
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Vincent Renardias wrote:
2.1r3 is the next release of slink;
Right. It's the third point-release of slink, and point-release only
have security-fixes and very important bugfixes.
IMHO the stable update should be 2.2 and then potato can be either 2.3
or
On Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 09:23:29PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
2.1r3 is the next release of slink;
Right. It's the third point-release of slink, and point-release only
have security-fixes and very important bugfixes.
IMHO the stable update should be 2.2 and then potato can be
On Sat, Aug 14, 1999 at 12:10:10PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
package: ftape
version: 4.03pre2.1999.04.25-1
major update over slink, don't think it meets the update criteria
First of all it's only a minor update: slink has got pre1. Secondly
* compiles with 2.2.x kernels
*
Christian Meder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Aug 14, 1999 at 12:10:10PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
package: ftape
version: 4.03pre2.1999.04.25-1
major update over slink, don't think it meets the update criteria
First of all it's only a minor update: slink has got pre1.
Hello,
On Sat, 14 Aug 1999, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Packages I think should NOT be installed
[snip]
package: gdb
version: 4.17-4.m68k.objc.threads.hwwp.fpu.gnat.3.1
some sparc update, but I'm not convinced we need to include it. We
Herbert, I apologize, I think you were right. According to
Debian-testing group, the following kernel/rescue disk seems to work
quite well.
Karl, I'd like to provide your rescue image in the Debian archive
proper (i.e., dists/stable/disks-i386/current/aha/ ?). Should we just
grab your rescue
301 - 400 of 400 matches
Mail list logo
