Alexander Reichle-Schmehl schrieb:
> The integration of OpenJDK, a free version of Sun's Java technology,
> into Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 made it possible to ship Java based
> applications in Debians "main" repository.
It is worth mentioning OpenJDK in Debian, but the conclusion is plain wrong and
doe
Yes, I agress it is a good idea to have the versioning of the next
release desided alread at release time for release notes.
I was just a bit used to get to wonder about that a bit until release,
making guesses, betting etc. :)
//Marcus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.
On 2009-02-11 16:43, Marcus Lundblad wrote:
> Should squeeze be referred to as 6.0 already?
> Wouldn't that be decided later?
That has been announced by Adeodato Simó on 2009-01-28. It's a
good idea to decide both release (number) and code name one
release ahead for stuff like release notes, right
Hi
I found this in the release notes:
4.10. Deprecated packages
With the next release of Debian GNU/Linux 6.0 (codenamed squeeze)
   a bigger number of server packages will be deprecated, thus
updating to newer versions of those now will save you from
trouble when updating to 6.
Luk Claes schrieb:
>> Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 Lenny to Thiemo Seufer, a Debian
>> Developer who died on December 26th, 2008 in a tragic car accident.
> There seems to be a part of the sentence missing...
Thanks, fixed.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
===
Dedication
Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 Lenny to Thiemo Seufer, a Debian
Developer who
died on December 26th, 2008 in a tragic car accident.
There seems to be a part of the sentence missing...
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@
[ dropping some lists from CC since the involved people are either
subscribed somewhere else or BCCed ]
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl schrieb:
> The most current version may be found in a private subversion repository
> (to avoid conflicts when using the wiki). You can get the most recent
> versio
W. Martin Borgert (10/02/2009):
> On 2009-02-10 20:54, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> > What about:
> >
> > ... and more than 23,000 other packages ready to use software packages
> > (build from over 12,000 source packages).
built?
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 2009-02-10 20:54, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> What about:
>
> ... and more than 23,000 other packages ready to use software packages
> (build from over 12,000 source packages).
Perfect!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
On 2009-02-10 11:32, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Dienstag, 10. Februar 2009, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> > We could propably change aptitude into apt-get by a simple
> > search and replace in the release notes.
>
> I think it would be better to explicitly mention this change. Granted, many
> people n
Hi!
W. Martin Borgert schrieb:
> It's difficult to change all occurrences at the same time. Why
> not start with the release announcement and explicitly say 1x000
> *source* packages? Let's change it in other documents/pages when
> we're at them. Counting binary packages feels a little bit like
>
Hi,
On Dienstag, 10. Februar 2009, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> We could propably change aptitude into apt-get by a simple
> search and replace in the release notes.
I think it would be better to explicitly mention this change. Granted, many
people never switched to aptitude, but for those who did
On 2009-02-10 18:50, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> Yes the 23'000 are the binary packages for i386. Oh, I better correct that
> to 22'000 to reflect other archs, too.
>
> I took the number of binary packages, because we usually take the number of
> binary packages. It was in the last announc
Hi!
W. Martin Borgert schrieb:
> Maybe I overlooked it, but I suggest to mention:
>
> - Debian Live
> - Emdebian
> - Blu-ray
> - Netbooks/EEE PC
>
> One sentence each, written by a native speaker (i.e. not me! ha!)
All these got mentioned (by now).
Not sure about:
> - SELinux
> - OpenVZ
Don
Hi!
Adeodato Simó schrieb:
> Hey, Alexander, thanks for your work here! Some minor comments follow:
Thanks for the feedback; I applied your changes / added FIXME so I won't
forget them.
>> Hypervisor 3.2.1, OpenJDK 6b11 and more than 23,000 other ready to use
>> software packages.
>
> I don't
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> I've been busy at work and will update the draft in the evening including
> your change (as well as the other changes in the thread).
good to know, thanks.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: daniel.baum...@pa
Hi!
Daniel Baumann schrieb:
> Daniel Baumann wrote:
>> jup. therefore, please include the following paragraph below the
>> "Debian GNU/Linux can be installed [...]" paragraph:
>
> [...]
>
> haven't seen a commit of that to your draft, has this been
> lost/forgotton or are there any problems with
Daniel Baumann wrote:
> jup. therefore, please include the following paragraph below the
> "Debian GNU/Linux can be installed [...]" paragraph:
[...]
haven't seen a commit of that to your draft, has this been
lost/forgotton or are there any problems with the paragraph?
--
Address:Daniel
Zitat von "Julien Cristau" :
I don't think recommending its use in the release notes for
etch->lenny is a good idea at all.
We could propably change aptitude into apt-get by a simple
search and replace in the release notes. (Not globally, there
are some cases, where this is not possible. At som
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 23:17 +0100, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> Note, that the release notes still recommend aptitude (which
> I never used, so I'm neither pro nor contra), because it was
> agreed on for the etch release notes and the bug #411280 is
> still open. I would be happy if we (better late t
Zitat von "Steve Langasek" :
This is not a matter for you to decide by fiat. The tools recommended in
the release notes should be the ones that work most reliably for
dist-upgrading from the previous release. Based on various upgrade reports
I've seen over the past year, that isn't aptitude.
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 11:07:28PM +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> Ben Finney wrote:
> > Adeodato Simó writes:
> >>> Upgrades [… are automatically handled by the aptitude package
> >>> management tool for most configurations, and to a certain degree
> >>> also by the apt-get package managemen
Steve Langasek wrote:
>> The preferred tool is aptitude.
>
> This is not a matter for you to decide by fiat. The tools recommended in
> the release notes should be the ones that work most reliably for
> dist-upgrading from the previous release. Based on various upgrade reports
> I've seen over t
Ben Finney wrote:
> Adeodato Simó writes:
>
>>> Upgrades [… are automatically handled by the aptitude package
>>> management tool for most configurations, and to a certain degree
>>> also by the apt-get package management tool.
>> This should be consistent with the Release Notes. I haven't been
>
Adeodato Simó writes:
> > Upgrades [… are automatically handled by the aptitude package
> > management tool for most configurations, and to a certain degree
> > also by the apt-get package management tool.
>
> This should be consistent with the Release Notes. I haven't been
> tracking the releva
On 2009-02-09, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> --040603030801070601030404
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> [ Sorry for the cross post; just trying to make sure everyone is aware of
>
> The Debian Project is pleased to announce the official release of
> Debian GNU/Linux version 5.0, codenamed etch, after 22 months of
Hmm, shouldn't that be:
"codenamed lenny" :-)
and
> Also beginning with Debian GNU/Linux 4.0, the package management >
system
> has been improved regarding secu
On Monday 09 February 2009 13:19:06 Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > Support for Macromedias Flash format is available via the swfdec plugin.
>
> Should Gnash be mentioned here? Is it ready for such a high profile
> mention? (Maintainers Bcc'ed.)
I believe this would have to be (replace (R) with the regis
On Mon, 09 Feb 2009 14:41:12 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> > Maybe I overlooked it, but I suggest to mention:
> >
> > - Debian Live
>
> jup. therefore, please include the following paragraph below the
> "Debian GNU/Linux can be installed [...]" paragraph:
>
> In addi
W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> Maybe I overlooked it, but I suggest to mention:
>
> - Debian Live
jup. therefore, please include the following paragraph below the
"Debian GNU/Linux can be installed [...]" paragraph:
In addition to the regular installation media, Debian GNU/Linux can
now also be dire
Govern
Subject: Re: Draft for lenny release announcement
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 11:15:23AM +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> Debian GNU/Linux runs on computers ranging from palmtops and handheld
> systems to supercomputers, and on nearly everything in between. A total
> of
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, David Paleino wrote:
processors. The old ARM port (arm) is now depreceated.
^^^
s/depreceated/deprecated/
But... has it really been deprecated? Didn't know that :P
According to the release notes it will be in Lenny but no
Hey, Alexander, thanks for your work here! Some minor comments follow:
> supports a total of eleven processor architectures
As per Riku's comment about armel being missing, this should be 12.
> A total of eleven architectures are supported including:
Same here.
> Support for Macromedias Flash
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:46:55 +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 11:15:23AM +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> > Debian GNU/Linux runs on computers ranging from palmtops and handheld
> > systems to supercomputers, and on nearly everything in between. A total
> > of eleven ar
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 11:15:23AM +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> Debian GNU/Linux runs on computers ranging from palmtops and handheld
> systems to supercomputers, and on nearly everything in between. A total
> of eleven architectures are supported including: Sun SPARC (sparc), HP
> A
Zitat von "Alexander Reichle-Schmehl" :
[ Sorry for the cross post; just trying to make sure everyone is aware of
the current state ]
Maybe I overlooked it, but I suggest to mention:
- Debian Live
- Emdebian
- Blu-ray
- SELinux
- OpenVZ
- Netbooks/EEE PC
One sentence each, written by a nati
36 matches
Mail list logo
