Steve Langasek wrote:
With the conclusion of GR 2006-007[1], we now have a clear statement from the
Debian developers that it is acceptable to release etch with firmware that
does not meet our usual requirements for inclusion in main, subject to three
principal conditions:
1. the freedom of the
On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 09:04:40PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Firmware is:
* Derived from proprietary unpublished source code,
* Copyright (C) 2000-2003 Broadcom Corporation.
*
* Permission is hereby granted for the distribution of
With the conclusion of GR 2006-007[1], we now have a clear statement from the
Debian developers that it is acceptable to release etch with firmware that
does not meet our usual requirements for inclusion in main, subject to three
principal conditions:
1. the freedom of the kernel for etch will
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As mentioned above, it was discovered late in the process that three firmware
images included in the upstream kernel that are relevant to the installer are
not distributed under clearly DFSG-compliant licenses: tg3, typhoon, and
acenic. Of these, only
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 04:35:07PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
With the conclusion of GR 2006-007[1], we now have a clear statement from the
Debian developers that it is acceptable to release etch with firmware that
does not meet our usual requirements for inclusion in main, subject to three
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 08:46:29PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As mentioned above, it was discovered late in the process that three
firmware
images included in the upstream kernel that are relevant to the installer
are
not distributed
6 matches
Mail list logo
