Re: Request for migration to testing

2010-10-11 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:31:07 +0100, Daniel Silverstone wrote: > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 02:02:02PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > It should be fine, thanks :) > > ekeyd 1.1.3-3 has been uploaded, so assuming it's accepted into unstable, it's > there. I know this is late and if it's too lat

Re: Request for migration to testing

2010-10-11 Thread Daniel Silverstone
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 02:02:02PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > It should be fine, thanks :) ekeyd 1.1.3-3 has been uploaded, so assuming it's accepted into unstable, it's there. I know this is late and if it's too late then I apologise. I can only offer "life" as a reason for the delays :-(

Re: Request for migration to testing

2010-09-23 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:30:45 +0100, Daniel Silverstone wrote: > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 01:13:19PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > I would, once again, request that it be considered for migration. > > debian/control: > > -Architecture: alpha amd64 arm armel hppa i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerp

Re: Request for migration to testing

2010-09-23 Thread Daniel Silverstone
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 01:13:19PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > I would, once again, request that it be considered for migration. > debian/control: > -Architecture: alpha amd64 arm armel hppa i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 > sparc sh4 > +Architecture: alpha amd64 arm armel hppa i386 ia64 m

Re: Request for migration to testing

2010-09-23 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:38:27 +0100, Daniel Silverstone wrote: > On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 07:47:42PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > This bit is.. odd. Why trash the 1.1.2-1 entry, and change the date on > > 1.1.1-1? > > That was a cockup on my part due to using the wrong debian/ dir as the b

Re: Request for migration to testing

2010-09-23 Thread Daniel Silverstone
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 07:47:42PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > This bit is.. odd. Why trash the 1.1.2-1 entry, and change the date on > 1.1.1-1? That was a cockup on my part due to using the wrong debian/ dir as the basis for the new build. I have fixed that, along with reinstating the status

Re: Request for migration to testing

2010-09-06 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 12:44:10 +0100, Daniel Silverstone wrote: > diff -Nru ekeyd-1.1.2/debian/changelog ekeyd-1.1.3/debian/changelog > --- ekeyd-1.1.2/debian/changelog2010-09-06 11:02:35.0 + > +++ ekeyd-1.1.3/debian/changelog2010-09-06 11:02:35.0 + > @@ -

Request for migration to testing

2010-09-06 Thread Daniel Silverstone
Hi, At Adam's suggestion, I am placing my request for the migration of ekeyd-1.1.3-1 to testing here. The ekeyd source package builds three binary-arch packages: - ekeyd - ekeyd-uds - ekeyd-egd-linux These packages are not installed by default and are only of use to people who own a Simtec