Re: Results of the porter roll call (Was: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing)

2013-10-22 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 04:58:25PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: > On 2013-10-14 10:06, Sven Luther wrote: > > [...] > >>> I don't know upto what point you are familiar with my history and its > >>> link to the powerpc > >>> port, but it pains me to see that the powerpc port is left with so few > >

Re: Results of the porter roll call (Was: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing)

2013-10-21 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2013-10-14 10:06, Sven Luther wrote: > [...] >>> I don't know upto what point you are familiar with my history and its link >>> to the powerpc >>> port, but it pains me to see that the powerpc port is left with so few >>> porters, and that it >>> may mean the port being dropped. I also have n

Re: Results of the porter roll call (Was: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing)

2013-10-14 Thread Sven Luther
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 11:11:56PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: > On 2013-10-06 16:25, Sven Luther wrote: > > Hi Niels, > > > > Hey, > > (Dropping -devel and -ports in exchange for -powerpc; sounded like you > weren't subscribed to -powerpc, so direct CC for you as well) Seem fine. > > I don't

Re: Results of the porter roll call (Was: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing)

2013-10-12 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2013-10-06 16:25, Sven Luther wrote: > Hi Niels, > Hey, (Dropping -devel and -ports in exchange for -powerpc; sounded like you weren't subscribed to -powerpc, so direct CC for you as well) > I don't know upto what point you are familiar with my history and its link to > the powerpc > port,

Re: Results of the porter roll call (Was: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing)

2013-10-09 Thread Hector Oron
Hello, 2013/10/7 Riku Voipio : > On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 04:07:25PM +0100, Wookey wrote: >> +++ Niels Thykier [2013-10-02 09:45 +0200]: >> > armel: Wookey (DD), Gatis Visnevskis (!DD), Nobuhiro Iwamatsu (DD), Steve >> > McIntyre (DD) >> > armhf: Jeremiah Foster (!DD, but NM?), Wookey (DD), Justus

Re: Results of the porter roll call (Was: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing)

2013-10-07 Thread Riku Voipio
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 04:07:25PM +0100, Wookey wrote: > +++ Niels Thykier [2013-10-02 09:45 +0200]: > > armel: Wookey (DD), Gatis Visnevskis (!DD), Nobuhiro Iwamatsu (DD), Steve > > McIntyre (DD) > > armhf: Jeremiah Foster (!DD, but NM?), Wookey (DD), Justus Winter (!DD), > > Lennart Sorensen (

Re: Results of the porter roll call (Was: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing)

2013-10-06 Thread Sven Luther
Hi Niels, I don't know upto what point you are familiar with my history and its link to the powerpc port, but it pains me to see that the powerpc port is left with so few porters, and that it may mean the port being dropped. I also have not really followed the mailing lists since a long time,

Re: Results of the porter roll call (Was: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing)

2013-10-03 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 10:59:26AM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > On 10/02/2013 09:45, Niels Thykier wrote: > > Summary table: > > Arch || DDs || NMs/DMs || Other || Total > > ---++-++-++---++-- > [...] > > sparc[2] || 1 || 0 || 0 ||

Re: Results of the porter roll call (Was: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing)

2013-10-03 Thread Michael Cree
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 01:06:01AM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: > Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:44:44 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: > > > Yesterday I tried to setup a sparc64 chroot on a second disc in one of > > > my Sparcs, but the currently documented way[1] to do so failed[2]

Re: Results of the porter roll call (Was: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing)

2013-10-02 Thread Axel Beckert
Him Julien Cristau wrote: > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:44:44 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: > > Yesterday I tried to setup a sparc64 chroot on a second disc in one of > > my Sparcs, but the currently documented way[1] to do so failed[2] due > > to outdated packages. On a first glance it looks like mis

Re: Results of the porter roll call (Was: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing)

2013-10-02 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:44:44 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: > Yesterday I tried to setup a sparc64 chroot on a second disc in one of > my Sparcs, but the currently documented way[1] to do so failed[2] due > to outdated packages. On a first glance it looks like missing BinNMUs > for the Perl 5.14 t

Re: Results of the porter roll call (Was: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing)

2013-10-02 Thread Patrick Baggett
I'm interesting in helping on ia64. I'm not fluent in ia64 assembly, but I can get around pretty well. I'm very experienced in C/C++/Java and debugging. I've got a fully functional system running Xorg/Mesa3D/sound, so I can reproduce, test, and fix issues as time permits. Patrick Baggett On Wed,

Re: Results of the porter roll call (Was: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing)

2013-10-02 Thread Dave Jones
Hello, all. I am not currently a porter but I would like to be one for the s390x architecture. I am familiar with zSeries system programming and have a lot of experience in running Linux in virtual environments, mostly z/VM on large IBM processors.. I use Linux for 11 year, family with cross co

Re: Results of the porter roll call (Was: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing)

2013-10-02 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 04:07:25PM +0100, Wookey wrote: >+++ Niels Thykier [2013-10-02 09:45 +0200]: >> Hi, >> >> The final results are in: >> >> Summary table: >> Arch || DDs || NMs/DMs || Other || Total >> ---++-++-++---++-- >> armel || 3 ||

Re: Results of the porter roll call (Was: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing)

2013-10-02 Thread Wookey
+++ Niels Thykier [2013-10-02 09:45 +0200]: > Hi, > > The final results are in: > > Summary table: > Arch || DDs || NMs/DMs || Other || Total > ---++-++-++---++-- > armel || 3 || 0 || 1 ||4 > armhf || 3 || 1 ||

Re: Results of the porter roll call (Was: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing)

2013-10-02 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Add me for armel. Bastien Le 2 oct. 2013 09:46, "Niels Thykier" a écrit : > Hi, > > The final results are in: > > Summary table: > Arch || DDs || NMs/DMs || Other || Total > ---++-++-++---++-- > armel || 3 || 0 || 1 ||4 > armhf

Re: Results of the porter roll call (Was: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing)

2013-10-02 Thread Jon Ward
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 04:18:58PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > > The final results are in: > > > > Summary table: > > Arch || DDs || NMs/DMs || Other || Total > > ---++-++-++---++-- > > armel ||

Re: Results of the porter roll call (Was: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing)

2013-10-02 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi, [I've replaced debian-ports with debian-sparc in the recipients list] Niels Thykier wrote: > Arch || DDs || NMs/DMs || Other || Total > ---++-++-++---++-- […] > sparc[2] || 1 || 0 || 0 ||1 […] > [2] By the looks of it, if sparc w

Re: Results of the porter roll call (Was: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing)

2013-10-02 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
On 10/02/2013 09:45, Niels Thykier wrote: > Summary table: > Arch || DDs || NMs/DMs || Other || Total > ---++-++-++---++-- [...] > sparc[2] || 1 || 0 || 0 ||1 > > [2] By the looks of it, if sparc was replaced by sparc64, we could be >

Re: Results of the porter roll call (Was: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing)

2013-10-02 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > The final results are in: > > Summary table: > Arch || DDs || NMs/DMs || Other || Total > ---++-++-++---++-- > armel || 3 || 0 || 1 ||4 > armhf || 3 || 1 ||

Results of the porter roll call (Was: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing)

2013-10-02 Thread Niels Thykier
Hi, The final results are in: Summary table: Arch || DDs || NMs/DMs || Other || Total ---++-++-++---++-- armel || 3 || 0 || 1 ||4 armhf || 3 || 1 || 2 ||6 hurd-i386 || 5 || 0 || 3 ||8