Re: Reviewing/unblocking udev/175-7

2012-08-25 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Marco d'Itri (25/08/2012): > > 2. You want to compress only source with that, right? > No... Unless somebody strongly feels that XZ binary packages are not > yet acceptable for udev then I will fix this in the next upload. As mentioned by Ansgar (who worked on xz compression in a lot of packages)

Re: Reviewing/unblocking udev/175-7

2012-08-25 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Aug 25, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > 1. This one appears twice: > + * Moved 60-persistent-input.rules back from udev-gtk-udeb to udev-udeb. > +(Closes: #666223) > > I suspect a copy/paste failure, since 50-udev-default.rules was moved > to, but not mentioned in the changelog? It appears twi

Reviewing/unblocking udev/175-7

2012-08-25 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi Marco, reviewing udev's diff between testing and sid, I found those tiny things: 1. This one appears twice: + * Moved 60-persistent-input.rules back from udev-gtk-udeb to udev-udeb. +(Closes: #666223) I suspect a copy/paste failure, since 50-udev-default.rules was moved to, but not ment