Re: SRM update request: gnash (Re: Any hope of an gnash update in Lenny?)

2009-12-22 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, I've just upload gnash (0.8.4-3~lenny1) to stable-proposed-updates. cheers, Holger P.S.: for -edu: an upload to our lenny-test will follow... signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: SRM update request: gnash (Re: Any hope of an gnash update in Lenny?)

2009-12-21 Thread Holger Levsen
clone 497633 -1 reassign -1 release.debian.org retitle -1 gnash update in lenny fixing 497633 thanks Hi, On Sonntag, 20. Dezember 2009, Adam D. Barratt wrote: would you accept a update of gnash via s-p-u with the attached patch for 497633, severity important, causing ~/.Xsession of a user

Re: SRM update request: gnash (Re: Any hope of an gnash update in Lenny?)

2009-12-21 Thread Robert Millan
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 12:39:19PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: clone 497633 -1 reassign -1 release.debian.org retitle -1 gnash update in lenny fixing 497633 thanks Hi, On Sonntag, 20. Dezember 2009, Adam D. Barratt wrote: would you accept a update of gnash via s-p-u with the attached

Re: SRM update request: gnash (Re: Any hope of an gnash update in Lenny?)

2009-12-20 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 17:47 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: would you accept a update of gnash via s-p-u with the attached patch for 497633, severity important, causing ~/.Xsession of a user under certain frequent circumstances to grow several hundred megabytes in a few days as one can be

SRM update request: gnash (Re: Any hope of an gnash update in Lenny?)

2009-12-18 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi stable release managers, would you accept a update of gnash via s-p-u with the attached patch for 497633, severity important, causing ~/.Xsession of a user under certain frequent circumstances to grow several hundred megabytes in a few days as one can be read in the bug. (This has also