Hi Martin,
checking
http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/pwlib.html
and
http://packages.qa.debian.org/o/openh323.html
I seem to not have reached Jose in time to have him stop the upload. So
the minimal-invasive solution is void and we're now going for a full
rebuild. Sad, but true. Let's just hope d
Hi Martin,
after checking with the Reference you could give us a huge hand.
We only need a binary-upload for hppa. So checking
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-porter-guidelines
at
5.10.2.1 Recompilation or binary-only NMU
we need to have a hppa package of pwlib a
Hi Martin,
> You need to recompile pwlib, openh323 and GM.
not that it'd cheer me up very much, but yes it helps. We'll now prepare
the new uploads and hope that does move us finally through all buildds.
Thanks for the support!
--
Best regards,
Kilian
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein
Kilian Krause wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> according to
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=gnomemeeting&ver=1.0.2-5&arch=hppa&stamp=1094147124&file=log&as=raw
> the new binutils upload seems to also require a new openh323 (and maybe
> a new pwlib too). Unfortunately it's not listed which binuti
Hi Martin,
according to
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=gnomemeeting&ver=1.0.2-5&arch=hppa&stamp=1094147124&file=log&as=raw
the new binutils upload seems to also require a new openh323 (and maybe
a new pwlib too). Unfortunately it's not listed which binutils was used
for the compilation i
Kilian Krause wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> > I tracked the problem even further. Here is what I/we (Ulrich and I) did:
> >
> > * Compiled binutils 2.14.90.0.7-8 without the hppa-patch invented in
> >2.14.90.0.7-6.
> > * Compiled pwlib,
> > * Compiled openh323
> > * and compiled GM with that
Hi Martin,
> I tracked the problem even further. Here is what I/we (Ulrich and I) did:
>
> * Compiled binutils 2.14.90.0.7-8 without the hppa-patch invented in
>2.14.90.0.7-6.
> * Compiled pwlib,
> * Compiled openh323
> * and compiled GM with that version of binutils.
>
> This compile
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 11:33:25AM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > Christoph Ulrich Scholler wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Thu Aug 26, 2004 at 12:03:53 +0200, I wrote:
> > > > As you suggested, I'll try to recompile both PWLib and openh323 with
> > > > binut
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 11:33:25AM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Christoph Ulrich Scholler wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu Aug 26, 2004 at 12:03:53 +0200, I wrote:
> > > As you suggested, I'll try to recompile both PWLib and openh323 with
> > > binutils_2.14.90.0.7-5 and then gnomemeeting again
Christoph Ulrich Scholler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu Aug 26, 2004 at 12:03:53 +0200, I wrote:
> > As you suggested, I'll try to recompile both PWLib and openh323 with
> > binutils_2.14.90.0.7-5 and then gnomemeeting again.
>
> This approach works (as in "successfully produces a package"). However,
Hi,
On Thu Aug 26, 2004 at 12:03:53 +0200, I wrote:
> As you suggested, I'll try to recompile both PWLib and openh323 with
> binutils_2.14.90.0.7-5 and then gnomemeeting again.
This approach works (as in "successfully produces a package"). However,
downgrading binutils from 2.15-1 to 2.14.90.0.7
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 00:12:59 +0200, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
> > we did some investigations on that bug at the BSP weekend in
> > Darmstadt. what i found in my buildlog, is that it is using pwlib
> > 1.6.6 but expecting 1.6.5
> >
> > | checking for PWLib version... 1.6.6
> > | Sorry but the
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 11:44:04PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> [...]
> >
> > So, basically, we're copletely lost with this bug. And to round things
> > a bit more, while trying to debug it, we faced other bug: GM 0.98.5 fails
> > to
> > com
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
>
> Hi,
[...]
>
> So, basically, we're copletely lost with this bug. And to round things
> a bit more, while trying to debug it, we faced other bug: GM 0.98.5 fails to
> compile from source in Sarge due to GTK_DISABLED_DEPRECATED flag being
> set on upstream so
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 11:42:49PM +0200, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
[...]
> This could be "solved" dropping GnomeMeeting from HPPA, but I don't
> know the Release Managers would accept that, and I don't want to try to
> force that through ftp-masters without the consent of RM.
Package r
Hi,
Though I have talked a bit about this with Steve on IRC, I have made
some other checks and new things have arised.
When I talk about VoIP packages in this mail, I refer to those listed
with maintainer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, plus
GnomeMeeting.
After hard work these latest weeks, trying
16 matches
Mail list logo
