Hi everyone[1],
Here is a status update for xulrunner 1.9, and what remains to be done
to be ready for what we would like to be in Lenny.
In the past few weeks, I've uploaded several beta releases of xulrunner
to experimental, with the latest one, 1.9~b5-4 (in NEW) being more-or-less
in its final
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 09:30:16AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Hi everyone[1],
>
> Here is a status update for xulrunner 1.9, and what remains to be done
> to be ready for what we would like to be in Lenny.
(...)
Here is the timeline I will try to follow for this transition (I'll be
filing bugs a
* Mike Hommey [Mon, 12 May 2008 09:07:11 +0200]:
> May 25:
> Upload of xulrunner 1.9 in unstable.
> Request binNMUs for libmozjs-dev build dependent packages.
At that date I foresee we may be close to finishing or in the middle of
a couple transitions. Would you mind coming by -release before
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 02:57:23PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Please delay the xulrunner transition until the current gcj-4.2 and
> gcj-4.3 are in testing
When is that going to happen ?
> , or else you couple the move of those packages
> to testing to the xulrunner transition. At the same tim
Please delay the xulrunner transition until the current gcj-4.2 and
gcj-4.3 are in testing, or else you couple the move of those packages
to testing to the xulrunner transition. At the same time please get
rid of the uninstallability issues of xul/iceape with every
subsubminor version upgrade as lo
Hi,
Here is a status update for the coming xulrunner 1.9 transition.
Bugs have been files to follow necessary updates on the reverse
dependencies. The list can be seen with the following url:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=xulrunner-transition;[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
You'll note 10
6 matches
Mail list logo
