On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 04:02:50PM +1000, Peter HAWKINS wrote:
> I'm the maintainer (just returning from an extended unexpected
> vacation).
> The problem is this (from the buildd log):
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), debconf, python2.2-dev (>= 2.2.3),
> python2.3-dev, apache2, apache2-d
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 16:02:50 +1000, Peter HAWKINS wrote:
> The problem is this (from the buildd log):
>
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), debconf, python2.2-dev (>= 2.2.3),
> python2.3-dev, apache2, apache2-dev (>= 2.0.46-1)
A build dependency on a daemon package? That's evil, sick and
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 12:25:29PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 06:50, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Colin Watson writes:
> > > While this would probably help users, it won't make the transition
> > > easier as far as testing is concerned, because python comes from the
> > > pyt
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 10:48:11PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Colin Watson writes:
> > Buggy packages
> > ==
>
> gnue-* is missing here.
No; gnue-common in testing depended on python2.1, not python. The
version in unstable should certainly be fixed, but it's not holding up
testing
Hi...
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 10:53:13PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 10:47:09PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > Missing builds
> > > ==
>
> > > * libapache2-mod-python: powerpc
>
> > already asked for rebuild ... no reaction.
>
> I could take a look a
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 10:47:09PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Missing builds
> > ==
> > * libapache2-mod-python: powerpc
> already asked for rebuild ... no reaction.
I could take a look at this in the next day or two, if no one else
bites.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern progr
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 02:02:38PM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-29 22:47]:
> > but one of it's build-dep's is listed as:
> > -gimp1.2 (1.2.3-2.4 to -)
> > * Maintainer: Ben Gertzfield
> > * Valid candidate
> > so probably, it doesn't make
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 10:47:09PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > * gimp-python: #207304
>
> automake problem, which it seems I failed to fix.
>
> but one of it's build-dep's is listed as:
>
> -gimp1.2 (1.2.3-2.4 to -)
>
> * Maintainer: Ben Gertzfield
> * Valid candidate
>
> so p
* Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-29 22:47]:
> but one of it's build-dep's is listed as:
> -gimp1.2 (1.2.3-2.4 to -)
> * Maintainer: Ben Gertzfield
> * Valid candidate
> so probably, it doesn't make sense to move it to testing, if gimp1.2
> is removed.
Actually, gimp1.2 still
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 06:50, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Colin Watson writes:
> > On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 11:29:12PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> > > what about python2.3 having "Depends: python (>= 2.3)"
> > >
> > > This is IMHO a policy violation. python (2.3) should depend on python2.3,
> > > pyt
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * python-gnome2: s390
Due to #212854 on gnome-vfs2 ... I'll probably NMU gnome-vfs2 soon if
Takuo KITAME doesn't fix it.
Cheers,
Sebastien Bacher
Colin Watson writes:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 11:29:12PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> > what about python2.3 having "Depends: python (>= 2.3)"
> >
> > This is IMHO a policy violation. python (2.3) should depend on python2.3,
> > python2.3 should not depend on python.
> >
> > It's playing havoc
Colin Watson writes:
> (cc'ed to -release for general information)
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Here's a summary of the problems currently blocking python2.3 from
> testing. It may be slightly incomplete, but I think I've got most of
> them.
fyi, yesterday I updated the list from Joss, see
http://people.de
Colin Watson writes:
> Buggy packages
> ==
gnue-* is missing here.
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 11:29:12PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> what about python2.3 having "Depends: python (>= 2.3)"
>
> This is IMHO a policy violation. python (2.3) should depend on python2.3,
> python2.3 should not depend on python.
>
> It's playing havoc with my mixed testing/unstable sys
> (cc'ed to -release for general information)
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Here's a summary of the problems currently blocking python2.3 from
> testing. It may be slightly incomplete, but I think I've got most of
> them.
>
>
> Buggy packages
> ==
[...]
what about python2.3 having "Depends: pytho
* Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-29 11:49]:
> Buggy packages
> ==
>
> * garchiver: #210828
I requested its removal a while ago (#212383).
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 12:16:37PM +0100, Mikhail Sobolev wrote:
> is libmetakit-python missing from this list for a reason?
It depends on python2.2, which isn't a problem as far as testing's
concerned. Packages depending on 'python (>= 2.2), python (<< 2.3)' are
problematic.
--
Colin Watson
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 11:49:03AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
[ a list of packages skipped ]
is libmetakit-python missing from this list for a reason?
--
Misha
pgpdJaT1FnChh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
(cc'ed to -release for general information)
Hi folks,
Here's a summary of the problems currently blocking python2.3 from
testing. It may be slightly incomplete, but I think I've got most of
them.
Buggy packages
==
* garchiver: #210828
* gimp-python: #207304
* lincredits: co
20 matches
Mail list logo
