Mark Hymers (15/07/2012):
> At the release / boot team's request, the -udeb and source has been
> placed back in unstable for now. I've also re-opened the removal bug.
> Once d-i is properly transitioned to kmod, please let us know and
> we'll remove it from unstable again.
Thanks, appreciated.
On Sun, 15, Jul, 2012 at 03:09:46PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois spoke thus..
> Marco d'Itri (15/07/2012):
> > WTF are you talking about?
>
> Obviously: #681285
At the release / boot team's request, the -udeb and source has been
placed back in unstable for now. I've also re-opened the removal bug.
On
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 03:05:17PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> WTF are you talking about? We switched from module-init-tools to kmod
> months ago, and the last time I discussed d-i and modules with
> debian-boot people my understanding was that modules are now loaded by
> busybox.
Can you prov
Marco d'Itri (15/07/2012):
> WTF are you talking about?
Obviously: #681285
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi!
On 15.07.2012 14:59, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
thanks to the totally uncoordinated switch from module-init-tools to
kmod, d-i is badly broken. We're in freeze, neither debian-boot or
debian-release were contacted, that's a huge success!
Please unfuck this. And make sure you contact debian-boo
On Jul 15, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> thanks to the totally uncoordinated switch from module-init-tools to
> kmod, d-i is badly broken. We're in freeze, neither debian-boot or
> debian-release were contacted, that's a huge success!
WTF are you talking about? We switched from module-init-tools to km
Hi,
thanks to the totally uncoordinated switch from module-init-tools to
kmod, d-i is badly broken. We're in freeze, neither debian-boot or
debian-release were contacted, that's a huge success!
Please unfuck this. And make sure you contact debian-boot@ for any
further udeb addition or removal.
N
7 matches
Mail list logo
