On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 07:37:14PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
(2) nurbs++ has been failing to build on HPPA since July, while
innovation3d has
been failing to build on arm since July. If the mainttainer doesn't know
about
the problem, he's derelict. If he does know and doesn't care,
These are the qt2 packages. Currently they are held up because they
break innovation3d and nurbs++ -- both of these have newer, c102
versions in unstable which use qt3. They FTBFS on some architectures,
so they can't go in, but if they were removed from 'testing', it looks
like the qt2
Wouldn't it be more effective if you would try to fix these packages
instead of proposing to remove them?
No, it wouldn't.
(1) I couldn't care less about these packages. I'm not competent to fix them
and
I don't really want to.
(2) nurbs++ has been failing to build on HPPA since July,
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 07:37:14PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Wouldn't it be more effective if you would try to fix these packages
instead of proposing to remove them?
No, it wouldn't.
(1) I couldn't care less about these packages. I'm not competent to fix
them and
I don't really
4 matches
Mail list logo
