Re: Uncoordinated h323plus transition

2012-05-27 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Cyril Brulebois (24/05/2012): > it seems like we have an uncoordinated transition, from libh323-1.21.0 > to libh323-1.24.0. The following packages need binNMUs: > | # Broken Depends: > | openam: openam [amd64 armel armhf i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 s390x > sparc] > | openmcu: openmcu [amd6

Re: Uncoordinated h323plus transition

2012-05-24 Thread Mark Purcell
On Thu, 24 May 2012 09:31:27 Cyril Brulebois wrote: > it seems like we have an uncoordinated transition, from libh323-1.21.0 > to libh323-1.24.0. KiBi, Sorry about that, I should of included this with the ptlib transition. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Uncoordinated h323plus transition

2012-05-23 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, it seems like we have an uncoordinated transition, from libh323-1.21.0 to libh323-1.24.0. The following packages need binNMUs: | # Broken Depends: | openam: openam [amd64 armel armhf i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 s390x sparc] | openmcu: openmcu [amd64 armel armhf i386 ia64 mips mipsel po