Re: Update on state of Mono for Wheezy

2013-02-06 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 22:09 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [-7 mono upload dropping armhf] > Thanks; I've unblocked that as an aid to showing us what's still broken. > > virtuoso-opensource has been uploaded and unblocked and #699542 filed > for the tidy-up. I've just filed #699568-72 for the binar

Re: Update on state of Mono for Wheezy

2013-02-01 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 17:21 +, Jo Shields wrote: > On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 21:45 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Assuming that supporting mono/armhf in a stable release is still not > > practical, is there anything we can do to help move this forward? [...] > I've uploaded a -7 package, which a

Re: Update on state of Mono for Wheezy

2013-01-29 Thread Jo Shields
On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 21:45 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2012-12-08 at 15:46 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 18:38 +0100, Jo Shields wrote: > > > = > > > Bug#682284: mono-runtime: SIGSEGV while executing native code on armhf[0] > > > = > > > > This got so

Re: Update on state of Mono for Wheezy

2013-01-27 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2012-12-08 at 15:46 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 18:38 +0100, Jo Shields wrote: > > = > > Bug#682284: mono-runtime: SIGSEGV while executing native code on armhf[0] > > = > > This got solved via: > > > 2) remove armhf as an architecture for Mono, > > in th

Re: Update on state of Mono for Wheezy

2012-12-09 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2012-12-09 at 12:24 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 15:46:00 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > mummy also produces the "mummy" binary, so would need a sourceful upload > > to drop the -cil package. It has a libunwind dependency so would also > > need a tpu due to t

Re: Update on state of Mono for Wheezy

2012-12-09 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 15:46:00 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > mummy also produces the "mummy" binary, so would need a sourceful upload > to drop the -cil package. It has a libunwind dependency so would also > need a tpu due to the libunwind8 mess. :-( For added fun, the package is > in sync bet

Re: Update on state of Mono for Wheezy

2012-12-08 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 18:38 +0100, Jo Shields wrote: > = > Bug#682284: mono-runtime: SIGSEGV while executing native code on armhf[0] > = This got solved via: > 2) remove armhf as an architecture for Mono, in the end. CVE-2012-3543 came along just afterwards and things seem to have fallen

Re: Update on state of Mono for Wheezy

2012-08-08 Thread Jo Shields
2) Remove the libmono-webbrowser{2,4}.0-cil packages entirely, therebybreaking all apps which link against them (affecting only non-Debianapps, but still, it may inconvenience users, especially users migratingtheir apps from Windows). Sorry, this is factually incorrect. Think before typing nex

Update on state of Mono for Wheezy

2012-08-08 Thread Jo Shields
So, I was feeling all pleased with the state of Mono for Wheezy, then some considerate souls go and file a couple of nontrivial RC bugs, post-freeze. Hooray, etc. Since these are nontrivial, and the possible fixes may (will) result in fairly messy uploads of one kind or another, I felt it was