On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 09:03:20AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 08:35:12PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
From bjorn.haxx.se:
20 packages wait for lcms (63 days old, Valid candidate, breaks 309 pkgs)
Really? This seems unlikely.
Nothing automatic deals with
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From bjorn.haxx.se:
20 packages wait for lcms (63 days old, Valid candidate, breaks 309 pkgs)
Really? This seems unlikely.
Most of those seem to be indirect dependencies and don't really count.
The problem is that testing has liblcms, while
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 08:35:12PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
From bjorn.haxx.se:
20 packages wait for lcms (63 days old, Valid candidate, breaks 309 pkgs)
Really? This seems unlikely.
Nothing automatic deals with complicated chains very well. lcms, libmng,
libwmf, imagemagick, and
From bjorn.haxx.se:
20 packages wait for lcms (63 days old, Valid candidate, breaks 309 pkgs)
Really? This seems unlikely.
Perhaps it needs hinting?
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 08:35:12PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
From bjorn.haxx.se:
20 packages wait for lcms (63 days old, Valid candidate, breaks 309 pkgs)
Really? This seems unlikely.
Perhaps it needs hinting?
Yes, it needs hinting. I think Colin was taking care of this one, but I
5 matches
Mail list logo