Re: Xapian 1.2 for squeeze?

2010-08-24 Thread Olly Betts
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:29:50PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Please go ahead with the upload of xapian 1.2 to unstable. Uploaded. Cheers, Olly -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian

Re: Xapian 1.2 for squeeze?

2010-08-23 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 11:09 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > The primary issue I can see is that the Xapian transition overlaps with > the apt transition. Both are in turn currently blocked by the fact that > aptitude FTBFS on s390. As mentioned on IRC, we're running the apt and xapian transitions

Re: Xapian 1.2 for squeeze?

2010-07-01 Thread Olly Betts
On 2010-07-01, Olly Betts wrote: > So I think that means that the only overlap for Xapian now is with the > apt transition. > > Is there a plan for what order to do things in? I'm likely to be packaging > a new upstream release (Xapian 1.2.2) in the next few days, so was just > wondering if I sho

Re: Xapian 1.2 for squeeze?

2010-07-01 Thread Olly Betts
On 2010-05-14, Olly Betts wrote: > On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:09:08AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> The primary issue I can see is that the Xapian transition overlaps with >> the apt transition. Both are in turn currently blocked by the fact that >> aptitude FTBFS on s390. > > #580085 - looks

Re: Xapian 1.2 for squeeze?

2010-05-14 Thread Olly Betts
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:09:08AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 00:31 +1200, Olly Betts wrote: > > On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 02:48:40AM +1200, Olly Betts wrote: > > > On 2010-04-30, I wrote: > > > > http://trac.xapian.org/wiki/DebianXapian1.2.0 > > > [...] > > > http://bugs.d

Re: Xapian 1.2 for squeeze?

2010-05-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 00:31 +1200, Olly Betts wrote: > On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 02:48:40AM +1200, Olly Betts wrote: > > On 2010-04-30, I wrote: > > > I'm tracking status here: > > > > > > http://trac.xapian.org/wiki/DebianXapian1.2.0 > > > > I've now checked all the reverse dependencies. Three pac

Re: Xapian 1.2 for squeeze?

2010-05-05 Thread Olly Betts
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 02:48:40AM +1200, Olly Betts wrote: > On 2010-04-30, I wrote: > > I'm tracking status here: > > > > http://trac.xapian.org/wiki/DebianXapian1.2.0 > > I've now checked all the reverse dependencies. Three packages need a small > patch, and one (notmuch) FTBFS but also does i

Re: Xapian 1.2 for squeeze?

2010-05-02 Thread Olly Betts
On 2010-04-30, I wrote: > Xapian 1.2.0 was released this week, and I'd like to try to get it in for > squeeze - it's smaller, faster, has more features, and will be supported by > upstream for more of the life of squeeze. > > For Debian, "Xapian" means source packages xapian-core, xapian-bindings,

Xapian 1.2 for squeeze?

2010-04-29 Thread Olly Betts
Xapian 1.2.0 was released this week, and I'd like to try to get it in for squeeze - it's smaller, faster, has more features, and will be supported by upstream for more of the life of squeeze. For Debian, "Xapian" means source packages xapian-core, xapian-bindings, xapian-omega, and libsearch-xapia