Hi Eric,
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013, at 4:50, Eric Dorland wrote:
* Ondřej Surý (ond...@sury.org) wrote:
Hi,
recent automake transition to 1.14 broke (FTBFS) at least two of my
packages.
Would it be possible to coordinate the (next) transition better than
uploaddeal with breakages like
Hi!
On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 11:09:26 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
I have seen these two breakages (so far):
libgd2: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=724841
This uses -Werror in AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE, don't do that.
gyrus: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=724917
* Guillem Jover (guil...@debian.org) wrote:
Hi!
On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 11:09:26 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
I have seen these two breakages (so far):
libgd2: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=724841
This uses -Werror in AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE, don't do that.
Ah yes, this has
* Ondřej Surý (ond...@sury.org) wrote:
Hi Eric,
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013, at 4:50, Eric Dorland wrote:
* Ondřej Surý (ond...@sury.org) wrote:
Hi,
recent automake transition to 1.14 broke (FTBFS) at least two of my
packages.
Would it be possible to coordinate the (next)
On 30.09.2013 16:58, Eric Dorland wrote:
Doing a rebuild is something I could try for next time. I'm not really
familiar with how to do that though, can you point me in the right
direction? What sort of lintian checks did you have in mind?
At minimum the packages using Werror should be test
Hi,
recent automake transition to 1.14 broke (FTBFS) at least two of my
packages.
Would it be possible to coordinate the (next) transition better than
uploaddeal with breakages like we do with the rest of our packages?
O.
--
Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org
Knot DNS (https://www.knot-dns.cz/) – a
* Ondřej Surý (ond...@sury.org) wrote:
Hi,
recent automake transition to 1.14 broke (FTBFS) at least two of my
packages.
Would it be possible to coordinate the (next) transition better than
uploaddeal with breakages like we do with the rest of our packages?
Did the transition from
7 matches
Mail list logo