Re: binNMU for mcabber and hint into testing

2006-12-12 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Mario Iseli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 03:07:59PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: The diff is quite big, and I don't see important bugs closed in the changelog (haven't looked at the rest). So, no, unless you provide a better to reason to hint it in, I will not

binNMU for mcabber and hint into testing

2006-12-11 Thread Mario Iseli
Dear releaseteam, http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mcabber.html mcabber didn't build on the hppa architecture but was tested for 17 days and doesn't have bugs. Could you please schedule a binNMU for it and hint the current version into etch if the build was succesful? I would be happy to see

Re: binNMU for mcabber and hint into testing

2006-12-11 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Mario Iseli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mcabber.html mcabber didn't build on the hppa architecture but was tested for 17 days and doesn't have bugs. Could you please schedule a binNMU for it As you can see on http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=mcabber, it was