Aníbal Monsalve Salazar a écrit :
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 11:09:56AM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:50:28PM +0200, Fabrice Lorrain wrote:
What is the current status of nfsv4 in testing.
We are waiting for two packages in NEW, libgssapi and librpcsecgss.
* Aníbal Monsalve Salazar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060603 03:24]:
> On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 11:09:56AM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> >On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:50:28PM +0200, Fabrice Lorrain wrote:
> >>What is the current status of nfsv4 in testing.
> >
> >We are waiting for two packages in
* Bill Allombert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060602 16:57]:
> On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 08:59:58AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060601 18:22]:
> > > The python team has essentially ignored questions about when this
> > > transition will happen, or answered them
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 11:09:56AM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
>On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:50:28PM +0200, Fabrice Lorrain wrote:
>>What is the current status of nfsv4 in testing.
>
>We are waiting for two packages in NEW, libgssapi and librpcsecgss.
They are now in incoming.debian.org, t
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 12:54:53AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 07:40:40PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > No, because no one had proposed it as a pet release goal, and it also
> I missed this, probably my fault. Is there an "official", or at least
> standardized wa
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 08:59:58AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060601 18:22]:
> > The python team has essentially ignored questions about when this
> > transition will happen, or answered them by saying "the answer is on
> > the debian-python list", whic
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 07:40:40PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> No, because no one had proposed it as a pet release goal, and it also
I missed this, probably my fault. Is there an "official", or at least
standardized way, for proposing pet release goals?
TIA,
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*
* Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060601 18:22]:
> The python team has essentially ignored questions about when this
> transition will happen, or answered them by saying "the answer is on
> the debian-python list", which it is certainly not.
We had a pretty good discussion on debconf abou
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Python
> ==
>
> There was a python BoF at DebConf where we discussed some changes to
> python policy. For the normal audience, the main result is that we
> will get rid of pythonX.Y-foo-packages in the general case. Also, python
> transitions will
Hi Andreas,
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 08:45:12PM +0200, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Fabrice Lorrain ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060531 00:28]:
> > I've a vague memory of a general "consensus" on "let's see how it works
> > during the sarge era" for volatile.debian.net.
> >
> >
Hi,
* Fabrice Lorrain ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060531 00:28]:
> I've a vague memory of a general "consensus" on "let's see how it works
> during the sarge era" for volatile.debian.net.
>
> Any particular plan/trend for the etch era ?
>
> A summary/status from people in charge of volatile might be o
On Wed, 31 May 2006, Sven Luther wrote:
> > In the last 6 months we had:
> > - multiarch support added to ld by Aurelien jarno
>
> And Aurelien Jarno telling us he was sick of nothing happening in early april,
> and wanting to drop it all. And apparently some of his multi-arch proposals
> was refu
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 08:46:48AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 31 May 2006, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Maybe, but biarch are what we have now, and what can be made to work. I
> > asked
> > this same question 6+ month ago, and you gave me the same reply, and
> > multi-arch has not progresse
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar a écrit :
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:50:28PM +0200, Fabrice Lorrain wrote:
What is the current status of nfsv4 in testing.
We are waiting for two packages in NEW, libgssapi and librpcsecgss.
Best Regards,
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
I had missed the libgssapi status.
Le Mer 31 Mai 2006 08:46, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> On Wed, 31 May 2006, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Maybe, but biarch are what we have now, and what can be made to
> > work. I asked this same question 6+ month ago, and you gave me the
> > same reply, and multi-arch has not progressed an inch since th
On Wed, 31 May 2006, Sven Luther wrote:
> Maybe, but biarch are what we have now, and what can be made to work. I asked
> this same question 6+ month ago, and you gave me the same reply, and
> multi-arch has not progressed an inch since then.
This is wrong. Sven, please stop saying that nothing ch
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 02:48:43PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 01:26:16PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 12:05:26PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
>
> > > another month has passed and DebConf happened, so we have a few more
> > > changes to announce.
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 02:19:30AM +0200, Fabrice Lorrain wrote:
> >You'll want to direct these questions to the respective maintainers, not to
> >the release team.
> You removed "Release Goals" from my previous mail...
Er, because it was quoted text from Andi's mail, not something you had
writte
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:50:28PM +0200, Fabrice Lorrain wrote:
>What is the current status of nfsv4 in testing.
We are waiting for two packages in NEW, libgssapi and librpcsecgss.
Best Regards,
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
--
http://v7w.com/anibal
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Steve Langasek a écrit :
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:50:28PM +0200, Fabrice Lorrain wrote:
What is the current status of nfsv4 in testing.
What can we expect for etch ?
- does people from debian kernel-team follow the current dev (CITI
patch, krb5p support reintroduce in late 2.6.17 etc...) ?
-
Steve Langasek a écrit :
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:50:28PM +0200, Fabrice Lorrain wrote:
What is the current status of nfsv4 in testing.
What can we expect for etch ?
- does people from debian kernel-team follow the current dev (CITI
patch, krb5p support reintroduce in late 2.6.17 etc...) ?
-
On 5/30/06, Fabrice Lorrain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Any particular plan/trend for the etch era ?
I, for one, hope that it continues.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:50:28PM +0200, Fabrice Lorrain wrote:
> What is the current status of nfsv4 in testing.
> What can we expect for etch ?
> - does people from debian kernel-team follow the current dev (CITI
> patch, krb5p support reintroduce in late 2.6.17 etc...) ?
> - What is the curr
Andreas Barth a écrit :
Hi,
another month has passed and DebConf happened, so we have a few more
changes to announce.
Release Goals
=
etc (cut)
Hello,
I've a vague memory of a general "consensus" on "let's see how it works
during the sarge era" for volatile.debian.net.
A
Andreas Barth a écrit :
Hi,
another month has passed and DebConf happened, so we have a few more
changes to announce.
Release Goals
=
After some discussion, we've decided to clarify the handling of "pet
release goals". The set of "release blockers" established last year
remains t
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 01:26:16PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 12:05:26PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > another month has passed and DebConf happened, so we have a few more
> > changes to announce.
> > Release Goals
> > =
> I guess from the above, and previo
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 12:05:26PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> another month has passed and DebConf happened, so we have a few more
> changes to announce.
>
> Release Goals
> =
I guess from the above, and previous mails from the multi-arch proposers, that
this means that mu
27 matches
Mail list logo
