Re: bug in tar 1.14-2.1

2006-03-30 Thread Bdale Garbee
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 05:27 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Again? I wrote a bug about this years ago with a fix. I think is was just adding --rsh=/usr/bin/rsh to the configure call. Your patch in response to 185594 added an RSH environment variable definition to the configure invocation.

Re: bug in tar 1.14-2.1

2006-03-27 Thread Andreas Barth
* Martin Zobel-Helas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060324 16:00]: Looks like just rebuilding the security version resolves that error, for whatever reason. Julien and me just cross checked that and got the same result. If noone minds we reupload tar with a bumped version number to s-p-u. Is a

Re: bug in tar 1.14-2.1

2006-03-27 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Hi Andi, On Monday, 27 Mar 2006, you wrote: * Martin Zobel-Helas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060324 16:00]: Looks like just rebuilding the security version resolves that error, for whatever reason. Julien and me just cross checked that and got the same result. If noone minds we reupload tar

Re: bug in tar 1.14-2.1

2006-03-27 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi Andi, On Monday, 27 Mar 2006, you wrote: * Martin Zobel-Helas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060324 16:00]: Looks like just rebuilding the security version resolves that error, for whatever reason. Julien and me just cross checked that and got the

Re: bug in tar 1.14-2.1

2006-03-25 Thread Bdale Garbee
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 22:07 +0100, Julien Danjou wrote: Finally, I solved it this way: diff -u tar-1.14/debian/rules tar-1.14/debian/rules --- tar-1.14/debian/rules +++ tar-1.14/debian/rules @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ build-stamp: dh_testdir - $(MAKE) + RSH=/usr/bin/rsh

Re: bug in tar 1.14-2.1

2006-03-25 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2006-03-25 Bdale Garbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] However, I don't immediately understand why the auto* tools are being invoked by make during this build? [...] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ lsdiff -z tar_1.14-2.1.diff.gz | \ egrep -v '/debian/|/src/'

Re: bug in tar 1.14-2.1

2006-03-25 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 2006-03-25 Bdale Garbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] However, I don't immediately understand why the auto* tools are being invoked by make during this build? [...] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ lsdiff -z tar_1.14-2.1.diff.gz | \

Re: bug in tar 1.14-2.1

2006-03-25 Thread Bdale Garbee
On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 18:36 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: On 2006-03-25 Bdale Garbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] However, I don't immediately understand why the auto* tools are being invoked by make during this build? [...] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ lsdiff -z tar_1.14-2.1.diff.gz | \

Re: bug in tar 1.14-2.1

2006-03-24 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Hi mollo, On Sunday, 19 Mar 2006, you wrote: On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 15:19:58 +0100 using tar 1.14-2.1 fw:/home/mathieu# tar --rmt-command=/usr/sbin/rmt -cvf '[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/mathieu/test.tgz' /etc tar: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/mathieu/test.tgz: Cannot open: Input/output error tar:

Re: bug in tar 1.14-2.1

2006-03-24 Thread Bdale Garbee
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 15:53 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: If noone minds we reupload tar with a bumped version number to s-p-u. Ok with me. Bdale -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: bug in tar 1.14-2.1

2006-03-24 Thread Julien Danjou
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 03:53:03PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: Looks like just rebuilding the security version resolves that error, for whatever reason. Julien and me just cross checked that and got the same result. We tried to reproduce the bug with zobel, and finally discovered the

Re: bug in tar 1.14-2.1

2006-03-24 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Julien Danjou [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 03:53:03PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: Looks like just rebuilding the security version resolves that error, for whatever reason. Julien and me just cross checked that and got the same result. We tried to reproduce the bug