Mattia Dongili wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 09:59:23PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Mattia Dongili wrote:
>>> Hi,
>> Hi
>>
>>> from the debian linux-2.6 svn repository it looks like
>>> CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER is not going to be set for 2.6.26.
>>>
>>> cpufreqd has a grave bug filed (#484467) fo
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 09:59:23PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Mattia Dongili wrote:
>> Hi,
>
> Hi
>
>> from the debian linux-2.6 svn repository it looks like
>> CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER is not going to be set for 2.6.26.
>>
>> cpufreqd has a grave bug filed (#484467) for the broken ACPI battery
>> l
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 09:59:23PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Mattia Dongili wrote:
>> Hi,
>
> Hi
>
>> from the debian linux-2.6 svn repository it looks like
>> CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER is not going to be set for 2.6.26.
>>
>> cpufreqd has a grave bug filed (#484467) for the broken ACPI battery
>> l
Mattia Dongili wrote:
Hi,
Hi
from the debian linux-2.6 svn repository it looks like
CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER is not going to be set for 2.6.26.
cpufreqd has a grave bug filed (#484467) for the broken ACPI battery
level support.
I (with the cpufreqd upstream hat on) released a new cpufreqd (2
Hi,
from the debian linux-2.6 svn repository it looks like
CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER is not going to be set for 2.6.26.
cpufreqd has a grave bug filed (#484467) for the broken ACPI battery
level support.
I (with the cpufreqd upstream hat on) released a new cpufreqd (2.3.0)
that reads from sysfs ra
5 matches
Mail list logo