* Luk Claes [Sun, 24 Aug 2008 20:01:52 +0200]:
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Sunday 24 August 2008 17:52, Luk Claes wrote:
It would be a pity if jifty will not be in lenny while near 20 new
needed dependencies were added for jifty and they will be almost useless
without it.
No, sorry, in
Yves Agostini wrote:
Dear release managers,
Please consider giving a freeze exception for jifty 0.80408-2 to migrate
to lenny. The upload contains a fix for a FTBFS bug[0]. 0.80408-1 was
uploaded only on 29 Jul 2008 [1] and don't arrived in testing, so it's a
new package.
It would
On Sunday 24 August 2008 17:52, Luk Claes wrote:
It would be a pity if jifty will not be in lenny while near 20 new
needed dependencies were added for jifty and they will be almost useless
without it.
No, sorry, in general we don't include new packages into lenny at this
stage.
Would it
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Sunday 24 August 2008 17:52, Luk Claes wrote:
It would be a pity if jifty will not be in lenny while near 20 new
needed dependencies were added for jifty and they will be almost useless
without it.
No, sorry, in general we don't include new packages into lenny at
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Sunday 24 August 2008 17:52, Luk Claes wrote:
It would be a pity if jifty will not be in lenny while near 20 new
needed dependencies were added for jifty and they will be almost useless
without it.
No, sorry, in general we don't include new packages into lenny
Yves AGOSTINI wrote:
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Sunday 24 August 2008 17:52, Luk Claes wrote:
It would be a pity if jifty will not be in lenny while near 20 new
needed dependencies were added for jifty and they will be almost useless
without it.
No, sorry, in general we don't include new
Dear release managers,
Please consider giving a freeze exception for jifty 0.80408-2 to migrate
to lenny. The upload contains a fix for a FTBFS bug[0]. 0.80408-1 was
uploaded only on 29 Jul 2008 [1] and don't arrived in testing, so it's a
new package.
It would be a pity if jifty
7 matches
Mail list logo
