On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 07:04:37PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 12:14:40AM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 10:01:35AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> >>> buildd.debian.org shows geda-gnetlist and geda-gsymcheck were last built
>
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 12:14:40AM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 10:01:35AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>>> buildd.debian.org shows geda-gnetlist and geda-gsymcheck were last built
>>> on hppa several days ago but haven't been accepted into unstable
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 12:14:40AM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 10:01:35AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > buildd.debian.org shows geda-gnetlist and geda-gsymcheck were last built
> > on hppa several days ago but haven't been accepted into unstable yet?
> > Is this somethin
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 10:01:35AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> buildd.debian.org shows geda-gnetlist and geda-gsymcheck were last built
> on hppa several days ago but haven't been accepted into unstable yet?
> Is this something you can investigate? These binaries are needed for
> lenny.
Both ar
Hi,
buildd.debian.org shows geda-gnetlist and geda-gsymcheck were last built
on hppa several days ago but haven't been accepted into unstable yet?
Is this something you can investigate? These binaries are needed for
lenny.
geda-gschem and some of the others also took a few days from build to
unst
5 matches
Mail list logo