Re: hint for vice/1.22-2

Hi all involved, On Sun, 2008-01-13 at 12:54 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > Please contact d-release next time to get the issue resolved. Will do. > Not arch:all (architecture independent) but arch:any (as it's > architecture dependent), but yes. The s390 porter noted to remove the > not-for-us.

Re: hint for vice/1.22-2

On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 12:24:00PM +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: > On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 13:30 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 09:26:59PM +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: > > That's not how hinting works. > Thought so, but couldn't get porters to remove the false depend

Re: hint for vice/1.22-2

Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: > Hi Steve, > > On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 13:30 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 09:26:59PM +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: >> That's not how hinting works. > Thought so, but couldn't get porters to remove the false dependency. > >> But that seems un

Re: hint for vice/1.22-2

Hi Steve, On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 13:30 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 09:26:59PM +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: > That's not how hinting works. Thought so, but couldn't get porters to remove the false dependency. > But that seems unlikely to happen, since you've removed

Re: hint for vice/1.22-2

On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 09:26:59PM +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: > Please hint vice 1.22-2 into testing, it's blocked by s390 and sparc. As > none of them in the > archs field for now, it is ready for migration. That's not how hinting works. You need to sort out with the porters why these pac

hint for vice/1.22-2

Hi, Please hint vice 1.22-2 into testing, it's blocked by s390 and sparc. As none of them in the archs field for now, it is ready for migration. Thanks, Laszlo/GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]