On Fri, 30 Aug 2019, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 30 Aug 2019, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > > We're not speaking of crap software, we're just speaking of software that
> > > can't be maintained multiple years by backports of security patches, where
> > > we get fixes only with new upstre
Hi,
On Fri, 30 Aug 2019, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > We're not speaking of crap software, we're just speaking of software that
> > can't be maintained multiple years by backports of security patches, where
> > we get fixes only with new upstream versions (mixed with new features).
> I don't want to
On Fri, 30 Aug 2019, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Aug 2019, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > There were several discussions over the last years. And yes, our vision of
> > backports does not match the vision of those fastpace/not ready for
> > stable/whatever you call them repos. In our vision deb
On Fri, 30 Aug 2019, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> There were several discussions over the last years. And yes, our vision of
> backports does not match the vision of those fastpace/not ready for
> stable/whatever you call them repos. In our vision debian-backports consists
> of new (tested, as in "is in
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 09:17:32AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 30 Aug 2019, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> > Fast Track repo works exactly like current backports except the packages
> > are added from unstable (or experimental during transitions and freeze)
> > as they cannot go to te
On Fri, 30 Aug 2019, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 30 Aug 2019, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> > Fast Track repo works exactly like current backports except the packages
> > are added from unstable (or experimental during transitions and freeze)
> > as they cannot go to testing and hence to c
Hi,
On Fri, 30 Aug 2019, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> Fast Track repo works exactly like current backports except the packages
> are added from unstable (or experimental during transitions and freeze)
> as they cannot go to testing and hence to current backports.
>
> As Paul noted earlier, backports t
[Resending because I got some bounces]
On 2019, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 29 7:50:00 PM IST, Dan Clery wrote:
>Isn't this the sort of problem that things like flatpack or snap were
>created for?
In those solutions either security updates have to handled by each flatpack or
snap instead of sharing it (duplicatio
[Resending because I got some bounces]
On 2019, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 29 7:10:38 PM IST, Abhijith PA wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>On 29/08/19 6:47 pm, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> On 29-08-2019 14:28, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>>> (Note: pkg-security@tracker.d.o is not a valid email, dropped)
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Thu
Isn't this the sort of problem that things like flatpack or snap were
created for?
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 9:57 AM Abhijith PA wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
>
> Hi,
>
> On 29/08/19 6:47 pm, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On 29-08-2019 14:28, Raphael Hertzog wrot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
On 29/08/19 6:47 pm, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 29-08-2019 14:28, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> (Note: pkg-security@tracker.d.o is not a valid email, dropped)
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, 29 Aug 2019, Holger Levsen wrote:
In general, we (Deb
Hi
On 29-08-2019 14:28, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> (Note: pkg-security@tracker.d.o is not a valid email, dropped)
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2019, Holger Levsen wrote:
>>> In general, we (Debian) don't have a good answer to this problem and
>>> virtualbox is clearly a bad precedent. We really need
(Note: pkg-security@tracker.d.o is not a valid email, dropped)
Hi,
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > In general, we (Debian) don't have a good answer to this problem and
> > virtualbox is clearly a bad precedent. We really need to find a solution
> > to this in concertation with the r
hi,
(this started as a discussion whether to update radare2 in (old)stable
and has since then evolved into a discussion about the problem
summarized well by Raphael.)
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 01:48:14PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2019, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > The upstream
14 matches
Mail list logo