/debian/patches/series
@@ -3,0 +4 @@
+CVE-2010-2575.diff
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- okular-0.7.orig/debian/patches/CVE-2010-2575.diff
+++ okular-0.7/debian/patches/CVE-2010-2575.diff
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+Index: kdegraphics/okular/generators/plucker/unpluck/image.cpp
Hello, KDE people.
I notice kdegraphics 4.2.2 provides a libkexiv2-7 binary, which is is a
higher SONAME than the one provided by the libkexiv2 source package
both in unstable and experimental. Does this mean the libkexiv2 source
package, together with its libkexiv2-{3,5} and libkexiv2-dev binary
+ Sune Vuorela (Tue, 12 May 2009 12:08:20 +0200):
On Tuesday 12 May 2009 11:50:53 Adeodato Simó wrote:
Hello, KDE people.
I notice kdegraphics 4.2.2 provides a libkexiv2-7 binary, which is is a
higher SONAME than the one provided by the libkexiv2 source package
both in unstable
On Tuesday 12 May 2009 11:50:53 Adeodato Simó wrote:
Hello, KDE people.
I notice kdegraphics 4.2.2 provides a libkexiv2-7 binary, which is is a
higher SONAME than the one provided by the libkexiv2 source package
both in unstable and experimental. Does this mean the libkexiv2 source
package
I notice kdegraphics 4.2.2 provides a libkexiv2-7 binary, which is is a
higher SONAME than the one provided by the libkexiv2 source package
both in unstable and experimental. Does this mean the libkexiv2 source
package, together with its libkexiv2-{3,5} and libkexiv2-dev binary
packages
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 01:54:48PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
The latest kdegraphics failed to build on HPPA for reasons which are
clearly nothing to do with it:
[...]
Anyway, kdegraphics built everywhere else.
This might be a transient buildd problem, or a bug in tetex-base.
I hope
The latest kdegraphics failed to build on HPPA for reasons which are
clearly nothing to do with it:
Setting up tetex-base (3.0-11) ...
Removing unchanged obsolete conffiles ... done
/var/lib/dpkg/info/tetex-base.postinst: line 678: update-language: command not
found
dpkg: error processing tetex
New version, 4:3.4.3-4
So the hint needs to be updated in order to give output. :-(
--
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A thousand reasons. http://www.thousandreasons.org/
Lies, theft, war, kidnapping, torture, rape, murder...
Get me out of this fascist nightmare!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Steve Langasek schrieb am Dienstag, 30. November 2004 um 17:24:38 -0800:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 10:19:43PM +0100, Joerg Friedrich wrote:
Sourcepackage: kdegraphics
the binary package kdegraphics, a simple metapackage, is Arch all and
depends on all binarys build from the kdegraphics source
Hi again,
after reading the latest Release Update from Andreas I wonder what will
happen with this issue I reported last week?
ATM installing installation of a simple Desktopenvironment will fail on
all architectures exept for i386 and powerpc. Reason:
Sourcepackage: kdegraphics
the binary
Hi,
I just tested the rc2-di on my Sun Ultra60. This worked pretty well, but
the selected task Desktop Environment just fails due to an
uninstallable kdegraphics. Reason is already reported (see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=271256)
Quoting Adeodato Simó in this bugreport
11 matches
Mail list logo
