Re: kernel-patch-openvz and new patch revision

2007-02-06 Thread Kir Kolyshkin
Ola Lundqvist wrote: Hi On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 06:48:30PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: Ola Lundqvist wrote: Hi I have got a request from upstream to change the patch revision from 028test007.1 to 028test015. The reason behind this is that it is definitly more stable than

Re: kernel-patch-openvz and new patch revision

2007-02-05 Thread Luk Claes
Ola Lundqvist wrote: Hi I have got a request from upstream to change the patch revision from 028test007.1 to 028test015. The reason behind this is that it is definitly more stable than the 028test007.1 version and have a number of bugfixes corrected. So I want to ask you if it is ok to upload

Re: kernel-patch-openvz and new patch revision

2007-02-05 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 06:48:30PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: Ola Lundqvist wrote: Hi I have got a request from upstream to change the patch revision from 028test007.1 to 028test015. The reason behind this is that it is definitly more stable than the 028test007.1 version and have a number

Re: kernel-patch-openvz

2006-12-21 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 06:10:05PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: Sorry to disturb, but now I have made a new version that I have uploaded to testing-proposed-updates. The reason for that is that I will soon upload a new version to unstable as well. Thanks, I've approved the version in t-p-u.

Re: kernel-patch-openvz

2006-12-17 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi again Sorry to disturb, but now I have made a new version that I have uploaded to testing-proposed-updates. The reason for that is that I will soon upload a new version to unstable as well. On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 11:26:06PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 06:42:27AM

Re: kernel-patch-openvz

2006-12-16 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 06:42:27AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: I assume that you are very busy, but did my reasoning makes sense or do I have to do in some other way in order to get the package to testing? A 92000 line interdiff for a single important bug is probably not going to be accepted,

Re: kernel-patch-openvz

2006-12-14 Thread Ola Lundqvist
20:48]: I would like you to update kernel-patch-openvz as I (today) updated it in order to make the kernel compile on ia64 with ia32 bit compatibility flag on. If you know that the linux-2.6 version 2.6.18-8 will be accepted to testing you can wait, as I need to make a new upload

Re: kernel-patch-openvz

2006-12-12 Thread Andreas Barth
* Ola Lundqvist ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061211 20:48]: I would like you to update kernel-patch-openvz as I (today) updated it in order to make the kernel compile on ia64 with ia32 bit compatibility flag on. If you know that the linux-2.6 version 2.6.18-8 will be accepted to testing you can

Re: kernel-patch-openvz

2006-12-12 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 12:06:47PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: * Ola Lundqvist ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061211 20:48]: I would like you to update kernel-patch-openvz as I (today) updated it in order to make the kernel compile on ia64 with ia32 bit compatibility flag on. If you know

kernel-patch-openvz

2006-12-11 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi I would like you to update kernel-patch-openvz as I (today) updated it in order to make the kernel compile on ia64 with ia32 bit compatibility flag on. If you know that the linux-2.6 version 2.6.18-8 will be accepted to testing you can wait, as I need to make a new upload of kernel-patch