On Sun, 2022-06-05 at 19:37 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 05-06-2022 19:35, M. Zhou wrote:
> > > But if this is really the result of the rebuild. I think we just
> > > discovered a serious flaw. The alternative dependency on libluajit-5.1-2
> > > just lost its version constraint, as it's
Hi,
On 05-06-2022 19:35, M. Zhou wrote:
But if this is really the result of the rebuild. I think we just
discovered a serious flaw. The alternative dependency on libluajit-5.1-2
just lost its version constraint, as it's only added to libluajit2-5.1-2.
U... Yes, that's a good catch.
I
On Sun, 2022-06-05 at 11:43 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>
> > sbuild --no-clean -c sid -d unstable love_11.3-1.dsc --extra-package
> > ../luajit.pkg/
> > debc love_11.3-1_amd64.changes
> >
> > Package: love
> > Version: 11.3-1
> > Architecture: amd64
> > Maintainer: Debian Games Team
> >
Hi Mo,
On 05-06-2022 05:28, M. Zhou wrote:
Please see deb-symbols(5), the symbols control file contains a
part supporting advanced usage that not all Debian developers know:
That was indeed a missing piece.
Then I rebuild it against with the above luajit commit pending
to upload:
sbuild
On Sat, 2022-06-04 at 08:19 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>
> > So I uploaded luajit2, which at least passed hello world smoke
> > test on IBM arches including ppc64el and s390x.
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=luajit2
>
> May I ask what your reason is to have both? Why not
Hi Mo,
On 03-06-2022 07:09, M. Zhou wrote:
Long story short, src:luajit does not work on ppc64el because the
upstream is completely not interested in supporing IBM archs
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1011297
Ack.
So I uploaded luajit2, which at least passed hello world
Dear release team,
I feel the case I encountered is an unusual transition, so I'd like to
ask first before filing the bug.
Long story short, src:luajit does not work on ppc64el because the
upstream is completely not interested in supporing IBM archs
7 matches
Mail list logo