Re: kind of special transition for luajit{,2}?

2022-06-05 Thread M. Zhou
On Sun, 2022-06-05 at 19:37 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi, > > On 05-06-2022 19:35, M. Zhou wrote: > > > But if this is really the result of the rebuild. I think we just > > > discovered a serious flaw. The alternative dependency on libluajit-5.1-2 > > > just lost its version constraint, as it's

Re: kind of special transition for luajit{,2}?

2022-06-05 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 05-06-2022 19:35, M. Zhou wrote: But if this is really the result of the rebuild. I think we just discovered a serious flaw. The alternative dependency on libluajit-5.1-2 just lost its version constraint, as it's only added to libluajit2-5.1-2. U... Yes, that's a good catch. I

Re: kind of special transition for luajit{,2}?

2022-06-05 Thread M. Zhou
On Sun, 2022-06-05 at 11:43 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > > > sbuild --no-clean -c sid -d unstable love_11.3-1.dsc --extra-package > > ../luajit.pkg/ > > debc love_11.3-1_amd64.changes > > > > Package: love > > Version: 11.3-1 > > Architecture: amd64 > > Maintainer: Debian Games Team > >

Re: kind of special transition for luajit{,2}?

2022-06-05 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Mo, On 05-06-2022 05:28, M. Zhou wrote: Please see deb-symbols(5), the symbols control file contains a part supporting advanced usage that not all Debian developers know: That was indeed a missing piece. Then I rebuild it against with the above luajit commit pending to upload: sbuild

Re: kind of special transition for luajit{,2}?

2022-06-04 Thread M. Zhou
On Sat, 2022-06-04 at 08:19 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > > > So I uploaded luajit2, which at least passed hello world smoke > > test on IBM arches including ppc64el and s390x. > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=luajit2 > > May I ask what your reason is to have both? Why not

Re: kind of special transition for luajit{,2}?

2022-06-04 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Mo, On 03-06-2022 07:09, M. Zhou wrote: Long story short, src:luajit does not work on ppc64el because the upstream is completely not interested in supporing IBM archs https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1011297 Ack. So I uploaded luajit2, which at least passed hello world

kind of special transition for luajit{,2}?

2022-06-02 Thread M. Zhou
Dear release team, I feel the case I encountered is an unusual transition, so I'd like to ask first before filing the bug. Long story short, src:luajit does not work on ppc64el because the upstream is completely not interested in supporing IBM archs