Julian Field writes:
> On 25/12/08 21:38, Nico Golde wrote:
>> I'm afraid this is too late, mailscanner has already been
>> removed from lenny.
> Shame you couldn't wait 6 days for the new stable release. I don't
> immediately release a new stable release after making lots of changes to
> ensure i
Hi,
* Simon Walter [2008-12-25 00:43]:
> "Gabor FUNK" writes:
[...]
> Current state of this work is: It works (MailScanner starts and scans
> a simple textmail) but it's not well tested. There still need to be
> done some testing with TNEF attachment, virus removal and some other
> cases.
>
>
On 25/12/08 21:38, Nico Golde wrote:
Hi,
* Simon Walter [2008-12-25 00:43]:
"Gabor FUNK" writes:
[...]
Current state of this work is: It works (MailScanner starts and scans
a simple textmail) but it's not well tested. There still need to be
done some testing with TNEF attach
Hi
"Gabor FUNK" writes:
>> mailscanner #506353
>> The maintainer Simon Walter writes:
>>In the current state the package should not be part of
>>the lenny release.
>>I'm in no position to fix all this. I'm not familiar enough with
>>the MailScanner sourcecode and I'm not able to
Thomas Viehmann writes:
> xml2rfc #506652
> The maintainer Florian Weimer:
> This means we shouldn't release the current xml2rfc version with
> lenny.
Removal hint added. Should a solution to this problem become available
soonish, the package should get back into lenny.
> mailscanner #5063
Hi,
* Gabor FUNK [2008-12-24 12:14]:
> http://www.mailscanner.info/ChangeLog
> 18/12/2008 New in Version 4.74.11-1
> ...
> * Fixes *
> 2 Major work on removing symlink attack vulnerabilities affecting -autoupdate
> lock files.
> Note: This vulnerability only affected systems where normal interac
so here are three RC bugs with maintainers clearly indicating that they
don't want the buggy packages to release and none look like they will be
fixed. The package do not have reverse dependencies, so they seem to be
good for removal.
mailscanner #506353
The maintainer Simon Walter writes:
Hi,
so here are three RC bugs with maintainers clearly indicating that they
don't want the buggy packages to release and none look like they will be
fixed. The package do not have reverse dependencies, so they seem to be
good for removal.
xml2rfc #506652
The maintainer Florian Weimer:
This me
8 matches
Mail list logo
