Re: libdb5, mips and squeeze

2010-08-24 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 05:23:39PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:15:14AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > libdb5 has been failing to build on mips and mipsel for over 5 weeks, > > and apparently nobody cares. > > I have multiple packages linked to it which have not been ab

Re: libdb5, mips and squeeze

2010-08-23 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:15:14AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > libdb5 has been failing to build on mips and mipsel for over 5 weeks, > and apparently nobody cares. > I have multiple packages linked to it which have not been able to move > to testing, should I rebuild them for tpu or can I expect t

Re: libdb5, mips and squeeze

2010-08-14 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Aug 13, Clint Adams wrote: > Inasmuch as three months ago there was no reason to believe that mips > would still be suffering from all kinds of toolchain breakage, I suppose. I still have seen no answers from the MIPS porters. Is there anybody home? -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description

Re: libdb5, mips and squeeze

2010-08-12 Thread Clint Adams
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:26:31PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > Not really, but was there a particular reason for not using the latest > release of the library? Three months ago there was no reason to believe > that it would not be releasable. Inasmuch as three months ago there was no reason to be

Re: libdb5, mips and squeeze

2010-08-12 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Aug 12, Julien Cristau wrote: > Is there a particular reason for not using the default (4.8) libdb > version for those 2 packages? They're the only reverse-depends of db5.0 > in the archive afaict. Not really, but was there a particular reason for not using the latest release of the library?

Re: libdb5, mips and squeeze

2010-08-12 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:15:14 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > libdb5 has been failing to build on mips and mipsel for over 5 weeks, > and apparently nobody cares. > I have multiple packages linked to it which have not been able to move > to testing, should I rebuild them for tpu or can I expect th

libdb5, mips and squeeze

2010-08-12 Thread Marco d'Itri
libdb5 has been failing to build on mips and mipsel for over 5 weeks, and apparently nobody cares. I have multiple packages linked to it which have not been able to move to testing, should I rebuild them for tpu or can I expect this to be solved in a reasonable timeframe? -- ciao, Marco signatu