Re: libf2c2 20061008-4.1 (Bug#508565, intend to NMU)

2009-01-04 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Sat, 3 Jan 2009 12:16:20 + Neil McGovern wrote: On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 04:15:17AM +0100, Evgeni Golov wrote: libf2c2 currently suffers from bad style on 64bit archs where a long is 8 bytes (see #508565 and #442018). Hi Evgeni, Please upload, and re-ping once it's hit unstable

Re: libf2c2 20061008-4.1 (Bug#508565, intend to NMU)

2009-01-04 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Evgeni Golov [Sun, 04 Jan 2009 10:48:39 +0100]: On Sat, 3 Jan 2009 12:16:20 + Neil McGovern wrote: On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 04:15:17AM +0100, Evgeni Golov wrote: libf2c2 currently suffers from bad style on 64bit archs where a long is 8 bytes (see #508565 and #442018). Hi Evgeni,

Re: libf2c2 20061008-4.1 (Bug#508565, intend to NMU)

2009-01-03 Thread Neil McGovern
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 04:15:17AM +0100, Evgeni Golov wrote: libf2c2 currently suffers from bad style on 64bit archs where a long is 8 bytes (see #508565 and #442018). Hi Evgeni, Please upload, and re-ping once it's hit unstable for unblocks and binNMUs. Thanks, Neil -- A. Because it breaks

libf2c2 20061008-4.1 (Bug#508565, intend to NMU)

2009-01-02 Thread Evgeni Golov
Dear debian-release, Asheesh, Juan Carlos and Cyril, libf2c2 currently suffers from bad style on 64bit archs where a long is 8 bytes (see #508565 and #442018). The current maintainer fixed that with an ugly sed for alpha and ia64, but there is also amd64 (and sparc64, but that's not present in