On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 03:00:54PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 07:40:28PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 07:20:40PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 02:32:51PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > > * Pierre Habouzit (mad
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 07:40:28PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 07:20:40PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 02:32:51PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > * Pierre Habouzit (madco...@madism.org) [090919 01:08]:
> > > > I'll put blocks in my hint fil
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 07:20:40PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 02:32:51PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Pierre Habouzit (madco...@madism.org) [090919 01:08]:
> > > I'll put blocks in my hint file to be sure that both those packages will
> > > migrate in testing toget
On 2009-09-19 19:20 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 02:32:51PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
>> * Pierre Habouzit (madco...@madism.org) [090919 01:08]:
>> > I'll put blocks in my hint file to be sure that both those packages will
>> > migrate in testing together (I'm unsure i
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 02:32:51PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Pierre Habouzit (madco...@madism.org) [090919 01:08]:
> > I'll put blocks in my hint file to be sure that both those packages will
> > migrate in testing together (I'm unsure if britney is clever enough to
> > block them until all t
On Sat, 19 Sep 2009, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Pierre Habouzit (madco...@madism.org) [090919 01:08]:
> > I'll put blocks in my hint file to be sure that both those packages will
> > migrate in testing together (I'm unsure if britney is clever enough to
> > block them until all the binNMUs are done,
* Pierre Habouzit (madco...@madism.org) [090919 01:08]:
> I'll put blocks in my hint file to be sure that both those packages will
> migrate in testing together (I'm unsure if britney is clever enough to
> block them until all the binNMUs are done, I don't think it is). Then
> please ask for binNMU
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 01:01:38PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 11:47:35AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > Actually, I have already done a test-rebuild of all the packages that
> > build-depends on libjpeg62-dev or libjpeg-dev against a modified
> > libjpeg7-dev
> > tha
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 01:01:38PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 11:47:35AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 01:08:12AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 12:04:32AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > > Dear developers,
> >
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 11:47:35AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 01:08:12AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 12:04:32AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > Dear developers,
> > >
> > > There is a new version of libjpeg in the archive (JPEG7), but is
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 01:08:12AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 12:04:32AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > Dear developers,
> >
> > There is a new version of libjpeg in the archive (JPEG7), but is it
> > not yet cleared for building packages against it.
> >
> > If your
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 12:04:32AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Dear developers,
>
> There is a new version of libjpeg in the archive (JPEG7), but is it
> not yet cleared for building packages against it.
>
> If your package Build-Depends on libjpeg62-dev, please change to 'libjpeg-dev'
> (with
12 matches
Mail list logo
