* Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk) [120523 20:36]:
> On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 22:31 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > mipsel buildds: In the last month, we had two buildds eating their hard
> > disk, so all the time only three buildds are active. The three can just
> > keep up but are obviousl
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 22:31 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> mipsel buildds: In the last month, we had two buildds eating their hard
> disk, so all the time only three buildds are active. The three can just
> keep up but are obviously not how it should be. The currently broken buildd
> is the non-DSAe
* Andreas Barth (a...@ayous.org) [120518 23:47]:
> Independend of that, we should replace the porterbox with the more
> stable version of the same hardware soon, even if only for stability.
> As said, that specific replacement box is currently being tested if it
> really runs stable. If it does, we
* Mehdi Dogguy (me...@dogguy.org) [120518 23:31]:
> On 18/05/12 22:31, Andreas Barth wrote:
>> mips porterbox: We currently have gabrielli, but as noted above it
>> sometimes isn't as stable as it should.
>
> fwiw, weasel mentioned that gabrielli has currently disk issues too.
Sounds like a recent
On 18/05/12 22:31, Andreas Barth wrote:
mips porterbox: We currently have gabrielli, but as noted above it
sometimes isn't as stable as it should.
fwiw, weasel mentioned that gabrielli has currently disk issues too.
--
Mehdi Dogguy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.deb
Hi,
regarding both mips and mipsel, a few remarks from the porters. Let's start
with our current buildd hardware:
1. swarm: can work as mips and mipsel. We have five such boxes, where one
is used as mips buildd (ball), two as mipsel (rem and mayer), one is
currently with Aurel, and one has a dead
6 matches
Mail list logo
