Re: missing geda-* builds on some arches

2008-04-21 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 07:19:22PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > geda-gnetlist: alpha, mips, mipsel, powerpc, i386, ia64 > > All given back. Also I notice that geda-gnetlist is listed as Dep-Wait on ia64. An earlier version required guile-1.

Re: missing geda-* builds on some arches

2008-04-21 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 04:04:43PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Hamish Moffatt [Tue, 22 Apr 2008 00:02:02 +1000]: > > > Thanks. So far, nothing has happened though. Are the builds just in the > > queue as normal or is something else wrong? > > They show as rebuilding (or already rebuilt or eve

Re: missing geda-* builds on some arches

2008-04-21 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Hamish Moffatt [Tue, 22 Apr 2008 00:02:02 +1000]: > Thanks. So far, nothing has happened though. Are the builds just in the > queue as normal or is something else wrong? They show as rebuilding (or already rebuilt or even installed) in

Re: missing geda-* builds on some arches

2008-04-21 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 07:19:22PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > geda-gschem: alpha, mips, mipsel, powerpc > > geda-gattrib: alpha, mips, mipsel, powerpc > > geda-gnetlist: alpha, mips, mipsel, powerpc, i386, ia64 > > geda-gsymcheck: alpha, mi

Re: missing geda-* builds on some arches

2008-04-19 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > geda-gschem: alpha, mips, mipsel, powerpc > geda-gattrib: alpha, mips, mipsel, powerpc > geda-gnetlist: alpha, mips, mipsel, powerpc, i386, ia64 > geda-gsymcheck: alpha, mips, mipsel, powerpc All given back. > What can I do? I don't want to upload a ne

missing geda-* builds on some arches

2008-04-19 Thread Hamish Moffatt
Various architectures are missing builds of the latest geda-gschem, geda-gattrib, geda-gnetlist and geda-gsymcheck packages in unstable. The builds failed initially due to unsatisfied build-deps. They have not been retried and email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] has been both unactioned and unanswered. Th