On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 01:32:19PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
* Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-10-11 19:22]:
Here is the current status of the mpich/hdf5/lam migration.
The following are uploaded, but some have build problems:
Source: blacs-mpi
Source: hdf5
Source:
* Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-10-24 23:59]:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 01:32:19PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
but shouldn't octave-forge and octaviz be included in the list above? These
packages are not currently in testing.
Because they're not in testing, they don't affect
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 10:08:52AM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
* Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-10-24 23:59]:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 01:32:19PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
but shouldn't octave-forge and octaviz be included in the list above?
These
packages are not
* Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-10-11 19:22]:
Here is the current status of the mpich/hdf5/lam migration.
The following are uploaded, but some have build problems:
Source: blacs-mpi
Source: hdf5
Source: illuminator
Source: lam
Source: mpb
Source: mpich
Source: netpipe
Source:
(Please note that I'm currently on vacation and won't have Internet access
for another week in about 15 minutes. Just checking in on things while
I'm gone.)
Rafael Laboissiere [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I guess we are getting quite close now (only rmpi on hppa is blocking
now) but shouldn't
* Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-10-05 01:28]:
octave-gpc needs a requeue (and I think that's all) on alpha and
mips, as it couldn't find libgpcl-dev and that package now appears to
be available. I'm not sure what's going on with it on ia64; it
installs libgpcl-dev and then can't
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 10:32:09AM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
* Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-10-05 01:28]:
octave-gpc needs a requeue (and I think that's all) on alpha and
mips, as it couldn't find libgpcl-dev and that package now appears to
be available. I'm not sure
Dear Steve,
the package was ready and in place but the URL wrong, the debian
subdir was missing
http://bioinformatics.pzr.uni-rostock.de/~moeller/clustalw-mpi
http://bioinformatics.pzr.uni-rostock.de/~moeller/debian/clustalw-mpi/
I am happy to sponsor an upload of this package for you if you
Hi Steffen,
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 01:17:07PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 02:08:21AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 07:22:07PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Here is the current status of the mpich/hdf5/lam migration.
Only one package still
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 06:55:15PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Following up on the issues from my previous note that still exist. Sorry
that I hadn't given this attention sooner; I've been a bit buried
preparing for vacation.
No worries. :)
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If the
severity 333462 serious
thanks
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 06:55:15PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
I've filed a bug against r-base for this. I'm going to file it at
severity: important since I don't want the bug itself to block
migration if hppa gets built
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 07:22:07PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Here is the current status of the mpich/hdf5/lam migration.
Only one package still needs an upload:
Source: clustalw-mpi (non-free)
FWIW, clustalw-mpi has now been removed from testing due to the RC bug you
filed on it previously.
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Going through the build problems on that list:
Oh, sorry, and parmetis (non-free) needs a build on mips. I keep
forgetting that one because it doesn't show up on the buildd report for
some reason, only in the update-excuses output.
--
Russ Allbery
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 02:08:21AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 07:22:07PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Here is the current status of the mpich/hdf5/lam migration.
Only one package still needs an upload:
Source: clustalw-mpi (non-free)
FWIW, clustalw-mpi has now
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 01:44:22AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
scalapack failed on powerpc with:
/usr/bin/ld:
/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../../../lib/libf2c.a(lread.o)(.got2+0xbc):
unresolvable R_PPC_ADDR32 relocation against symbol `f__units'
/usr/bin/ld:
Following up on the issues from my previous note that still exist. Sorry
that I hadn't given this attention sooner; I've been a bit buried
preparing for vacation.
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 11:58:11PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
rmpi is in dep-wait on arm
Here is the current status of the mpich/hdf5/lam migration.
Only one package still needs an upload:
Source: clustalw-mpi (non-free)
I have cc'd the maintainer on this message. If anyone else has a chance
to do an NMU, please do so, unless the maintainer speaks up and asks to
handle it. The
* Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-09-30 18:11]:
The following packages still need a new upload:
Source: r-cran-hdf5
Source: statdataml
Just to let you know: I will orphan soon these two packages and will
ultimately ask for removal from the archive. This is under discussion in
the
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 10:02:13AM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
* Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-09-30 18:11]:
The following packages still need a new upload:
Source: r-cran-hdf5
Source: statdataml
Just to let you know: I will orphan soon these two packages and will
Russ,
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 06:11:49PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Here is the current status of the mpich/hdf5/lam migration.
lam is currently building on m68k, after which point hdf5 needs to be
requeued on m68k, and then once it builds various other packages will need
requeues on m68k
Here is the current status of the mpich/hdf5/lam migration.
lam is currently building on m68k, after which point hdf5 needs to be
requeued on m68k, and then once it builds various other packages will need
requeues on m68k because they're blocked waiting for hdf5.
The following packages still
On 2005-09-26 Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 02:32:56PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
mkdir -p debian/tmp/usr/bin
cd $(dirname $(find -name lamclean -perm +u+x -type f
[...]
Thanks! This is ready for next upload whenever that happens, already
had uploaded /u+x (which appears to be working).
Take care,
Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 2005-09-26 Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at
Greetings!
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 02:32:56PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also, hdf5 depends on lam, which also had to do its own transition, and
that adds the following additional packages:
Package:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 12:55:14PM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote:
mkdir -p debian/tmp/usr/bin
cd $(dirname $(find -name lamclean -perm +u+x -type f |grep -v debian))
mv -f lamclean lamclean.old ( /usr/bin/make -n lamclean | awk
'/mkdir/ {next} /libtool/ { gsub([^
Greetings!
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 12:55:14PM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote:
mkdir -p debian/tmp/usr/bin
cd $(dirname $(find -name lamclean -perm +u+x -type f |grep -v debian))
mv -f lamclean lamclean.old ( /usr/bin/make -n lamclean | awk
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also, hdf5 depends on lam, which also had to do its own transition, and
that adds the following additional packages:
Package: libxmpi4
Package: netpipe-lam
Package: r-cran-rmpi
Package: xmpi
lam has now been uploaded with optimization lowered, which
Sorry about the long period between updates; I caught a cold last weekend
andn that sapped my energy for a while.
Unfortunately, more things are getting caught up in this transition than I
was hoping, not because of the library package changing names, but because
of mpich disappearing and being
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also, hdf5 depends on lam, which also had to do its own transition, and
that adds the following additional packages:
Package: libxmpi4
Package: netpipe-lam
Package: r-cran-rmpi
Package: xmpi
netpipe is already implicated in other parts of this
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 09:23:15PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Source: rmpi
Source: xmpi
Source: clustalw-mpi (non-free)
Thankfully, libxmpi4 doesn't pull in anything else. I'll add the above
packages to the list of ones that need RC bugs filed.
30 matches
Mail list logo
