@lists.debian.org
Subject: RE: mumble and celt, #682010, TC
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 21:09:59 +0200
Hi all,
I recall there was another shortcoming with mumble on Debian. Debian does not
allow multiple versions of a library to be installed.
Normally mumble is compiled against two celt libs 0.7.1 and 0.11.1
-Willem
-- former mumble hacker --
> From: chris.kna...@coredump.us
> To: debian-c...@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: mumble and celt, #682010, TC
> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:16:14 -0400
> CC: n...@halon.org.uk; ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk;
> debian-release@lists.debian.org
>
&
On Thursday, July 19, 2012 12:56:05, Neil McGovern wrote:
> [resent... signed this time. Again]
>
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 05:45:27PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > * That the package is likely to be able to communicate with
> > > non-debian
> > > derived distributions.
> >
> > The information
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 05:45:27PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > * That the package is likely to be able to communicate with non-debian
> > derived distributions.
>
> The information we seem to be getting is that it is indeed likely that
> the mumble we have will be able to do so, because mumble u
Neil McGovern writes ("Re: mumble and celt, #682010, TC"):
> I would be concerned if the mumble client in wheezy isn't able to call
> non-debian derived mumble servers.
Chris Knadle who has been doing a lot of the legwork investigating the
situation has addressed this prob
[resent... signed this time. Again]
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 05:45:27PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > * That the package is likely to be able to communicate with
> > non-debian
> > derived distributions.
>
> The information we seem to be getting is that it is indeed likely that
> the mumble we have
Neil McGovern writes ("Re: mumble and celt, #682010, TC"):
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:24:12AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > The problem with mumble and the celt codec has been referred to the TC
> > - see the bug mentioned above. I would be interested to hear from the
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:24:12AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> The problem with mumble and the celt codec has been referred to the TC
> - see the bug mentioned above. I would be interested to hear from the
> security and release teams.
>
I consider there to be two issues which would concern
Nico Golde writes ("Re: mumble and celt, #682010, TC"):
> * Ian Jackson [2012-07-19 01:27]:
> > * Do the security team have an opinion about the celt 0.7.1 codec?
> >Would you want to impose any conditions for it to be included
> >in wheey ?
>
> Th
Hi,
* Ian Jackson [2012-07-19 01:27]:
[...]
> * Do the security team have an opinion about the celt 0.7.1 codec?
>Would you want to impose any conditions for it to be included
>in wheey ?
The code does not give me an especially trustworthy impression to be honest,
especially due to the
(Please would others avoid CCing debian-release@ and security@, who
are probably very busy and don't want to get tons of argument in their
mailboxes.)
The problem with mumble and the celt codec has been referred to the TC
- see the bug mentioned above. I would be interested to hear from the
secur
11 matches
Mail list logo
