Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 10:52:14PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 02:28:51PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
>>> Hamish Moffatt wrote:
Could the RMs please comment on this proposed change? I realise we are
in deep freeze now but this discussion sta
On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 10:52:14PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 02:28:51PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> > Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > > Could the RMs please comment on this proposed change? I realise we are
> > > in deep freeze now but this discussion started well before that.
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 02:28:51PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > Could the RMs please comment on this proposed change? I realise we are
> > in deep freeze now but this discussion started well before that. Some of
> > the bugs fixed are serious (though logged upstream rather th
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 12:00:03AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 04:36:59AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>>> Hamish Moffatt (02/02/2009):
> RM asked for a full diff between 1.4.0 and 1.4.3 to be attached. If
> you can't do it, I will look
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 12:00:03AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 04:36:59AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Hamish Moffatt (02/02/2009):
> > > > RM asked for a full diff between 1.4.0 and 1.4.3 to be attached. If
> > > > you can't do it, I will look at it tonight.
> > >
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 00:00 +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 04:36:59AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Hamish Moffatt (02/02/2009):
> > > > RM asked for a full diff between 1.4.0 and 1.4.3 to be attached. If
> > > > you can't do it, I will look at it tonight.
> > >
> > >
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 04:36:59AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hamish Moffatt (02/02/2009):
> > > RM asked for a full diff between 1.4.0 and 1.4.3 to be attached. If
> > > you can't do it, I will look at it tonight.
> >
> > I've posted the diffs twice now, and the list is eating the posts.
>
Hamish Moffatt (02/02/2009):
> > RM asked for a full diff between 1.4.0 and 1.4.3 to be attached. If
> > you can't do it, I will look at it tonight.
>
> I've posted the diffs twice now, and the list is eating the posts.
> Unhappy with .diff.gz attachments? Too big? I'm not sure. There's
> about 1
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 03:11:27PM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 00:19, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
> > Ping? I'd like to get geda* 1.4.3 into lenny. Could you please consider
> > allowing this in?
>
> RM asked for a full diff between 1.4.0 and 1.4.3 to be attached. If you
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 00:19, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> Ping? I'd like to get geda* 1.4.3 into lenny. Could you please consider
> allowing this in?
RM asked for a full diff between 1.4.0 and 1.4.3 to be attached. If you
can't do it, I will look at it tonight.
Richard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 10:30:04AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> Upstream for geda* has released a new version with bug fixes only. This
> release has been specifically aimed at us, and contains bug fixes only.
> Some of the bugs are serious, some are minor, most aren't logged in our
> BTS.
>
>
Hi,
Upstream for geda* has released a new version with bug fixes only. This
release has been specifically aimed at us, and contains bug fixes only.
Some of the bugs are serious, some are minor, most aren't logged in our
BTS.
What is your opinion about including this in the release?
I have not u
12 matches
Mail list logo
