On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 18:06 -0400, Eric Cooper wrote:
> On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 05:23:59PM -0400, Eric Cooper wrote:
> > Alternatively, I can add a one-line patch to 4.5-1 that simply denies
> > requests for InRelease files (forcing the clients to fall back to
> > Release + Release.gpg files).
>
>
Hi,
Eric Cooper (10/05/2011):
> On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 05:23:59PM -0400, Eric Cooper wrote: >
> Alternatively, I can add a one-line patch to 4.5-1 that simply
> denies > requests for InRelease files (forcing the clients to fall
> back to > Release + Release.gpg files).
>
> I have gone ahead wit
On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 05:23:59PM -0400, Eric Cooper wrote:
> Alternatively, I can add a one-line patch to 4.5-1 that simply denies
> requests for InRelease files (forcing the clients to fall back to
> Release + Release.gpg files).
I have gone ahead with this approach; here is the patch against v
Hi Eric,
not a member of the release team, but since I've pushed a bit to get
a fixed package considered for stable, following up…
Eric Cooper (08/05/2011):
> The introduction of InRelease files makes the current stable version
> of approx (4.5-1) mostly useless for caching the wheezy and sid
>
The introduction of InRelease files makes the current stable version
of approx (4.5-1) mostly useless for caching the wheezy and sid
distributions. A typical use case is with pbuilder or d-i work.
The version in sid, 4.6-1, understands InRelease files and builds in
squeeze with no changes. But i
5 matches
Mail list logo
