On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 10:49:45AM -0400, Jereme Corrado wrote:
> Please consider faqomatic_2.721-6 for inclusion in sarge, in lieu of
> 2.721-4, which is currently frozen in testing.
Approved.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> I wouldn't call this important, as it's not a critical package or
> anything. I would make it a normal or even minor severity bug.
It's very important if you run multiple FOM's. :) I think the
severity of the bug is appropriate.
No, it's not a critical package, most are
I wouldn't call this important, as it's not a critical package or
anything. I would make it a normal or even minor severity bug.
Andrew Donnellan
On 5/21/05, Jereme Corrado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please consider faqomatic_2.721-6 for inclusion in sarge, in lieu of
> 2.721-4, which is curren
Please consider faqomatic_2.721-6 for inclusion in sarge, in lieu of
2.721-4, which is currently frozen in testing.
The freeze anouncement said that changes would be accepted into
testing if they meet these criteria:
- fixes for severity: important bugs in packages of priority:
optional or
4 matches
Mail list logo
