On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 07:18:06PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 April 2005 16:54, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > - Nothing in the package (binary or source) uniquely identifies the
> > kernel-source patchlevel used (including the added ABI name, since ABI name
> > != patchlevel)
> as we
resent as I go the debian-security-private-address wrong, please follow
reploy-to:
Hi,
btw, no need to cc: me, i'm subscribed to release, the bug and the package :-)
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 16:54, Steve Langasek wrote:
> - Nothing in the package (binary or source) uniquely identifies the
> ker
Hi,
btw, no need to cc: me, i'm subscribed to release, the bug and the package :-)
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 16:54, Steve Langasek wrote:
> - Nothing in the package (binary or source) uniquely identifies the
> kernel-source patchlevel used (including the added ABI name, since ABI name
> != patchle
Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 April 2005 12:42, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > > Hmmm... the only mail address for stable security support on
> > > http://www.debian.org/intro/organization is [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> didnt seem appropriate to me.
> > What's wrong with that
Hi Joey,
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 12:42, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Hmmm... the only mail address for stable security support on
> > http://www.debian.org/intro/organization is [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> didnt seem appropriate to me.
> What's wrong with that address?
The reason
Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hmmm... the only mail address for stable security support on
> http://www.debian.org/intro/organization is [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> didnt seem appropriate to me.
What's wrong with that address?
> Would that have been a better address ?
Yes.
Regards,
Hi Joey,
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 18:26, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Howto handle security fixes for fai-kernels
> > ---
> >
> > fai-kernels uses the kernel-source-2.4.27 and kernel-source-2.6.8
> > packages. If these packages get updated with a security fix,
Hi Steve,
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 16:54, Steve Langasek wrote:
> To reiterate our discussion on IRC, I don't think this addresses my
> concerns, which are that:
>
> - Nothing in the package (binary or source) uniquely identifies the
> kernel-source patchlevel used (including the added ABI name, s
Steve Langasek wrote:
> - Nothing in the source or binary package names matches the
> kernel.*2\.(4\.27|6\.8) regexp that I've been using so far to identify the
> kernel packages requiring attention
>
> I have no knowledge of how important the latter is to the security team;
> they may not be both
Holger Levsen wrote:
> Howto handle security fixes for fai-kernels
> ---
>
> fai-kernels uses the kernel-source-2.4.27 and kernel-source-2.6.8 packages.
> If these packages get updated with a security fix, fai-kernels needs to be
> rebuild.
>
> The kernel
Hi Holger,
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 12:35:44PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> to fix #297811, which is about adding the kernel abi version number to
> fai-kernels (which is only build on i386 currently, powerpc is pending) to be
> able to do security support for fai-kernels in sarge, I made the fo
Hi,
to fix #297811, which is about adding the kernel abi version number to
fai-kernels (which is only build on i386 currently, powerpc is pending) to be
able to do security support for fai-kernels in sarge, I made the following
changes and I would like to ask on the release managers and securit
12 matches
Mail list logo
