Re: rc3 release blockers

2005-03-02 Thread Joey Hess
Alastair McKinstry wrote: > With exquisite timing, bug #297661 was filed as Release-Critical against > iso-codes. A fix is now pending in CVS, but not uploaded. > > The problem was incorrect entries in iso_639.tab; this file is not used > in iso_3166_udeb, in d-i; the file is marked deprecated as

Re: rc3 release blockers

2005-03-02 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 08:33:07AM +, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > On Máirt, 2005-03-01 at 16:35 -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > > [Aside: A few non-d-i packages that build udebs are in inconsistent states > > in > > unstable, and the newer versions of them won't go in for rc3 unless this > > is clea

Re: rc3 release blockers

2005-03-02 Thread Alastair McKinstry
On MÃirt, 2005-03-01 at 16:35 -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > > [Aside: A few non-d-i packages that build udebs are in inconsistent states in > unstable, and the newer versions of them won't go in for rc3 unless this > is cleared up in time. Which is problimatic because we have older > versions of thes