* Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-03 01:07]:
# undistributable code in non-free, maintainer doesn't take action
remove 3270/3.2.17-2
remove abc2mtex/1.6.1-5
Should this maybe be removed from unstable then? The same question
basically goes for more or all of the other removal
* Martin Michlmayr ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040609 18:10]:
* Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-03 01:07]:
# undistributable code in non-free, maintainer doesn't take action
remove 3270/3.2.17-2
remove abc2mtex/1.6.1-5
Should this maybe be removed from unstable then? The same question
On Sun, Jun 06, 2004 at 01:35:05PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
# undistributable code in non-free, maintainer doesn't take action
remove 3270/3.2.17-2
remove abc2mtex/1.6.1-5
At only 22 days, these are currently below my threshold.
What is your current threshold?
Roughly 30, until
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 01:07:02AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
snip
# FTBFS, first reported on 2002-11-20, no success in fixing till now
remove xemacs21-packages/2003.01.27-1.1
Hint added, but this also seems to require removal of xemacs21 itself.
Thoughts?
Xemacs21
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040606 03:55]:
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
# FTBFS, first reported on 2002-11-20, no success in fixing till now
remove xemacs21-packages/2003.01.27-1.1
Hint added, but this also seems to require removal
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 01:07:02AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
I updated my aggressive removal suggestions. Please tell me if there
are any issues with it, so that I can update them. As I said, these
suggestions are quite aggressive IMHO, and I also picked some packages
up with the intention:
Hi,
I updated my aggressive removal suggestions. Please tell me if there
are any issues with it, so that I can update them. As I said, these
suggestions are quite aggressive IMHO, and I also picked some packages
up with the intention: It's just long enough, remove it.
New are also
7 matches
Mail list logo