On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 03:41:42PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 06:50:36PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > The exceptions are:
> > * linux-kernel-di-powerpc appears to require a 2.4 build host - I've
> >poked around looking for help here, but no volunteers yet.
>
> Stil
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 06:50:36PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> The exceptions are:
> * linux-kernel-di-powerpc appears to require a 2.4 build host - I've
>poked around looking for help here, but no volunteers yet.
Still need help with this one...
> * linux-kernel-di-m68k-* - I've just e-ma
dann frazier wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 01:32:42PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 09:23:45PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > > The more arches are built by the same person, the easier coordination is.
> > > So your offer is very welcome.
> > >
> > > Note that you'll need
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 01:32:42PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 09:23:45PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > The more arches are built by the same person, the easier coordination is.
> > So your offer is very welcome.
> >
> > Note that you'll need to check out the kernel udeb pa
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 09:33:54PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > That said, currently, backports are not an easy solution because of udev,
>> > which cannot be taken as is without pulling in the whol
Karl Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For people wanting to install Sarge on AMD64 I recommend using the
> mini.iso found here:
>
> http://amd64.debian.net/debian-installer/daily/netboot/
>
> I did a sarge jfs on RAID with home on jfs/raid1/lvm with only minor
> problems with this iso.
>
> Th
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 09:33:51PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 08 June 2006 20:08, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 07:16:57PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > > Only if we _would_ include some backports repository that is known to
> > > have a current backported kernel and all o
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 09:33:54PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > That said, currently, backports are not an easy solution because of udev,
> > which cannot be taken as is without pulling in the whole gnome, so a bit of
> > work is needed.
> >
>
For people wanting to install Sarge on AMD64 I recommend using the mini.iso
found here:
http://amd64.debian.net/debian-installer/daily/netboot/
I did a sarge jfs on RAID with home on jfs/raid1/lvm with only minor problems
with this iso.
There should be a mention of this iso on the main insta
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That said, currently, backports are not an easy solution because of udev,
> which cannot be taken as is without pulling in the whole gnome, so a bit of
> work is needed.
>
> Friendly,
>
> Sven Luther
What do you mean? You don't seriously mean udev depends
On Thursday 08 June 2006 20:08, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 07:16:57PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Only if we _would_ include some backports repository that is known to
> > have a current backported kernel and all other packages needed with
> > that kernel, but without random backp
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thursday 08 June 2006 13:33, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> > - increasing differences between the Sarge 2.6.8 and current kernels;
>>
>> That is a reason for.
>
> Only if we _would_ include some backports repository that is known to have
> a current bac
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 07:16:57PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 08 June 2006 13:33, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > > - increasing differences between the Sarge 2.6.8 and current kernels;
> >
> > That is a reason for.
>
> Only if we _would_ include some backports repository that is known
On Thursday 08 June 2006 13:33, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > - increasing differences between the Sarge 2.6.8 and current kernels;
>
> That is a reason for.
Only if we _would_ include some backports repository that is known to have
a current backported kernel and all other packages needed with
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 01:33:57PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What changes are those? Is Debian finaly going to use LABEL= or UUID=
> in the generated fstab?
I hope not; /dev/disk/by-* names seem a lot less kludgy to me.
--
dann frazier
--
To
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (Also replying to other mails about Sarge support in Etch installer)
>
> On Wednesday 07 June 2006 20:42, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I ment that when you select sarge in choose-mirror in expert mode you
>> get the
(Also replying to other mails about Sarge support in Etch installer)
On Wednesday 07 June 2006 20:42, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I ment that when you select sarge in choose-mirror in expert mode you
> get the inofficial list and if you choose etch/etch+1/
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 12:59:42AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> If using the testing images to install stable is not possible in the
> future then we should seriously consider releasing images with newer
> kernels in point releases or having D-I on backports.org.
This is being considered &
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 08:42:23PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > (Removed irrelevant CCs for this question)
>> >
>> > On Wednesday 07 June 2006 10:11, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> >> If possibly it w
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I ment that when you select sarge in choose-mirror in expert mode you
>> get the inofficial list and if you choose etch/etch+1/sid you get the
>> official one.
>>
>> Might be too much work for a transient problem though.
>
> I thought that installing sar
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 08:42:23PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > (Removed irrelevant CCs for this question)
> >
> > On Wednesday 07 June 2006 10:11, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> If possibly it would be nice to have different mirror lists for s
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (Removed irrelevant CCs for this question)
>
> On Wednesday 07 June 2006 10:11, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> If possibly it would be nice to have different mirror lists for sarge
>> and etch/sid in choose-mirror.
>
> This is not really a problem.
>
> choo
(Removed irrelevant CCs for this question)
On Wednesday 07 June 2006 10:11, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> If possibly it would be nice to have different mirror lists for sarge
> and etch/sid in choose-mirror.
This is not really a problem.
choose-mirror for Sarge will remain unchanged and thus k
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 09:23:45PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>> The more arches are built by the same person, the easier coordination is.
>> So your offer is very welcome.
>>
>> Note that you'll need to check out the kernel udeb package sources from
>> t
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 07:41:05PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Martin Schulze wrote:
> > It would be good if we would be able some day to release kernel
> > updates in a more timely fashion and also not accumulate this many
> > security updates in one update. However, due to the number of
>
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 09:15:44PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> I seem to remember though that the security update was planned for the end
> of Debconf, so I was a bit surprised when reading my mail backlog this
> week that it is not out yet.
That was the optimistic plan (I didn't mean to imply oth
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 09:23:45PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> The more arches are built by the same person, the easier coordination is.
> So your offer is very welcome.
>
> Note that you'll need to check out the kernel udeb package sources from
> the *sarge branch* of the d-i SVN repo for the dif
Martin Schulze wrote:
> It would be good if we would be able some day to release kernel
> updates in a more timely fashion and also not accumulate this many
> security updates in one update. However, due to the number of
> architectures and affected packages I'm not sure this goal can be met
> any
On Tuesday 06 June 2006 21:32, dann frazier wrote:
> I don't think its very likely that amd64/sarge will be added to
> debian.org,
I did not mean to imply that of course.
> but this is a good question for the amd64.debian.net maintainers.
The main reason we need to know is that the d-i source n
On Tuesday 06 June 2006 19:22, dann frazier wrote:
> I've offered to perform these builds for all archs except mips, mipsel
> & m68k (but I can help coordinate those as well - those arch
> maintainers have always been very responsive to my build requests).
>
> This offer is still open, just let me
On Tuesday 06 June 2006 18:01, dann frazier wrote:
> I believed aba, joeyh & fjp were all in on this decision, but apologies
> if it didn't get communicated back to everyone involved.
That's right, aba agreed to this plan as representative of the stable
release team. Also, I posted an update abou
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 06:56:33PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> However, if kernel udebs should be part of the security update, then
> we'll need proper source packages that build these udebs - or, if
> these already exist, a pointer which source package has been forgotton
> in the last kernel up
dann frazier wrote:
> I saw some questions on irc about the sarge3 kernel build & r3...
>
> it's just, i actualy wanted to release sarge r3 with sarge2
> kernels. now i get told sarge3-kernels are already prepared, which
> disapoints me a bit, as noone
I saw some questions on irc about the sarge3 kernel build & r3...
it's just, i actualy wanted to release sarge r3 with sarge2
kernels. now i get told sarge3-kernels are already prepared, which
disapoints me a bit, as noone told the stable release team there will
34 matches
Mail list logo
